Paper · 2019 · Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia

Beef cattle performance on signal grass pastures deferred and fertilized with nitrogen

P.L. Amorim; D.M. Fonseca; M.E.R. Santos; et al.

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The effect of four nitrogen levels (0, 40, 80 and 120kg N ha-1), applied before deferment on the beef cattle production and structural variables on Urochloa decumbens (signal grass) were assessed from January to October 2012 and from January to September 2013. A randomized block design with three replicates was adopted, in an arrangement of repeated measures in time (grazing period). An interaction effect between nitrogen level and grazing period was observed on extended-plant height and herbage mass. As the nitrogen levels were increased, extended-plant height, herbage mass, total herbage allowance, and efficiency of conversion of fertilizer into herbage were increased. Throughout the grazing period, pasture height, extended-plant height, percentage of leaves, herbage and morphological components allowance, and percentages of leaves and stems in the herbage apparently selected by the animal decreased. Nitrogen levels had no effect on average daily gain or gain per area in the first year. A fixed deferment period with increasing levels of nitrogen fertilization on signal grass pastures does not influence the average daily gain per animal, reduces the efficiency of the nitrogen fertilizer and negatively changes the structural characteristics of the pasture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level interacted with grazing period for extended-plant height and herbage mass.

Taxon
Urochloa decumbensUrochloa decumbense1
Treatment
nitrogen levele0
Outcome
extended-plant height and herbage masse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An interaction effect between nitrogen level and grazing period was observed on extended-plant height and herbage mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“signal grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa decumbens (signal grass)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen increased extended-plant height, herbage mass and total herbage allowance.

Taxon
Urochloa decumbensUrochloa decumbense1
Treatment
nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
extended-plant height, herbage mass, total herbage allowancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the nitrogen levels were increased, extended-plant height, herbage mass, total herbage allowance, and efficiency of conversion of fertilizer into herbage were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“signal grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa decumbens (signal grass)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen increased fertilizer-to-herbage conversion efficiency.

Taxon
Urochloa decumbensUrochloa decumbense1
Treatment
nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
efficiency of conversion of fertilizer into herbagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the nitrogen levels were increased, extended-plant height, herbage mass, total herbage allowance, and efficiency of conversion of fertilizer into herbage were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“signal grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa decumbens (signal grass)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–190 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasture and extended-plant heights and percentage of leaves declined over the grazing period.

Taxon
Urochloa decumbensUrochloa decumbense1
Outcome
pasture height, extended-plant height, percentage of leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
grazing periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Throughout the grazing period, pasture height, extended-plant height, percentage of leaves, herbage and morphological components allowance, and percentages of leaves and stems in the herbage apparently selected by the animal decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“signal grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa decumbens (signal grass)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–190 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbage and morphological-component allowance declined during grazing.

Taxon
Urochloa decumbensUrochloa decumbense1
Outcome
herbage and morphological components allowancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
grazing periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Throughout the grazing period, pasture height, extended-plant height, percentage of leaves, herbage and morphological components allowance, and percentages of leaves and stems in the herbage apparently selected by the animal decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“signal grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa decumbens (signal grass)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–190 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and stem percentages in herbage selected by cattle declined during grazing.

Taxon
Urochloa decumbensUrochloa decumbense1
Outcome
percentages of leaves and stems in the herbage apparently selected by the animale0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
grazing periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Throughout the grazing period, pasture height, extended-plant height, percentage of leaves, herbage and morphological components allowance, and percentages of leaves and stems in the herbage apparently selected by the animal decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“signal grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa decumbens (signal grass)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level did not affect cattle average daily gain or gain per area in the first year.

Taxon
Urochloa decumbensUrochloa decumbense1
Treatment
Nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
average daily gain or gain per areae0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen levels had no effect on average daily gain or gain per area in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“signal grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa decumbens (signal grass)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–190 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that more nitrogen under fixed deferment does not improve average daily cattle gain and reduces fertilizer efficiency and pasture structural quality.

Taxon
signal grasse0
Outcome
fixed deferment period with increasing levels of nitrogen fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“A fixed deferment period with increasing levels of nitrogen fertilization on signal grass pastures does not influence the average daily gain per animal, reduces the efficiency of the nitrogen fertilizer and negatively changes the structural characteristics of the pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1284 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Urochloa decumbensPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.