Paper · 2019 · Biosystems Engineering

Model selection with a common structure: Tomato crop growth models

Wouter J.P. Kuijpers; Marinus J.G. van de Molengraft; Simon van Mourik; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Crop modelling is an essential part of biosystems engineering; selecting or developing a crop model for a specific application, having its requirements and desires, is difficult if not impossible without the required domain knowledge. This paper presents a fundamentally different model selection approach based on biological functionalities. This is enabled by a common structure, which allows for a combining of components, yielding new models. This increased design space allows the development of models which are better suited to the application than the original models. The use of a common structure, and its potential, are demonstrated by a use-case involving the selection of a tomato crop model for a model-based control application, but the rationales and methodologies can apply to other crops and applications as well. In this paper, 27 valid model combinations have been created from 4 models. In the use-case presented, the models are compared to data originating from a real system. The predictive performance of a model is quantified by the Root-Mean-Squared-Error (RSME) between the predictions and data. One trade-off is model accuracy versus computational speed. With the model set used, a 13% decrease in RSME was obtained by allowing a 7.5% increase in model computation time compared to one of the original models.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The common structure produced 27 valid model combinations from four models.

Outcome
valid model combinationse0
Value
27 valid model combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this paper, 27 valid model combinations have been created from 4 models.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A selected model lowered RSME by 13% while raising computation time by 7.5% versus an original model.

Outcome
RSMEe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
7.5% increase in model computation timee0
Comparator
one of the original modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the model set used, a 13% decrease in RSME was obtained by allowing a 7.5% increase in model computation time compared to one of the original models.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑