Paper · 2019 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Effects of soil temperature and moisture on biological nitrogen fixation in soybean crop

Evandro Ademir Deak; Thomas Newton Martin; Glauber Monçon Fipke; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Soil temperature and humidity are the chief determinants for good nodule formation at the time of sowing and emergence. The aim of this study was to estimate the soil temperature and humidity range, at which the Bradyrhizobium spp., and Azospirillum brasilense may have the highest effect on root enhancement and development of nodulation in soybean. Two experiments were conducted, the first of which was done in the seed laboratory performing the treatments listed as non-inoculated; inoculation with Bradyrhizobium; root enhancers; inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + root enhancers; co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense; co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense + root enhancers, and assessed at temperatures of 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35ºC. The experimental design was completely randomized with distribution in a factorial. The second experiment was executed in a greenhouse, employing the same treatments affected in the seed laboratory experiment, but with the addition of non-inoculated control with mineral nitrogen. Tests were done at the soil moisture levels of 25, 50, 75 and 100% water retention capacity, forming a factorial 7 x 4 (only second experiment). All co-inoculated treatments induced the soybean root system to improve, in terms of length, volume, surface area and root diameter, exhibiting superiority to the uninoculated control in the 20 to 30ºC temperature range. The co-inoculation raised nodulation in the soybean crop, when soil water retention capacity was at the range of 56 - 96%, achieving higher means compared to the standard inoculation. The root planter added no improvement to either the root system or nodulation in soybean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation improved soybean root length, volume, surface area and diameter relative to uninoculated control at 20 to 30ºC.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
co-inoculated treatmentse0
Outcome
length, volume, surface area and root diametere0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
20 to 30ºCe0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All co-inoculated treatments induced the soybean root system to improve, in terms of length, volume, surface area and root diameter, exhibiting superiority to the uninoculated control in the 20 to 30ºC temperature range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased soybean nodulation at 56 - 96% soil water retention compared with standard inoculation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
co-inoculatione0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
raisede0
Qualifier
56 - 96%e0
Comparator
standard inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The co-inoculation raised nodulation in the soybean crop, when soil water retention capacity was at the range of 56 - 96%, achieving higher means compared to the standard inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The root planter did not improve soybean root system.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
root plantere0
Outcome
root systeme0
Direction
no improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root planter added no improvement to either the root system or nodulation in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The root planter did not improve soybean nodulation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
root plantere0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
no improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root planter added no improvement to either the root system or nodulation in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1702 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

310 papers: 265 positive, 45 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

306 papers more in this group

See all 310 papers →

inoculation · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

358 papers: 323 positive, 35 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

354 papers more in this group

See all 358 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.