Paper · 2021 · Journal of Natural Sciences Research

Verification of Fungicide and Its Application Frequency for Management of Frog Eye Leaf Spot (Cercospora capcisi) on Hot Pepper Under Rain Fed Condition at Bako

Feyera Takele Degefa

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cercospora leaf spot is caused by Cercospora capcisi is an important disease which reduces the productivity of hot pepper (Capsicum spp.). Field experiment was conducted to evaluate different fungicides and its application frequencies against Cercospora leaf spot in order to select an important fungicides and its application frequency at Bako Agricultural Research Center. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replication. Two different fungicides (Mancozeb 80WP and Trust-Cymocop 439.5WP) and four application frequencies (two, three, four and five) times with untreated control were used. Data on disease severity, area under disease progress curve, marketable yield and unmarketable yield of hot pepper were recorded. The result revealed that, both fungicides sprayed control Cercospora leaf spot which is significantly different from untreated check in disease severity, area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and marketable yield. However, application frequencies of fungicides were not significantly different on disease severity, AUDPC and marketable yield of the plant. Application of Trust Cymocop 439.5WP reduces 26.67% relative yield loss of hot pepper over control check. An economic analysis was done for fungicides and shows feasibility of fungicide application for management of Cercospora leaf spot. Fungicide which has the highest Marginal Rate of Return was used for recommendation. Two times application of Trust-Cymocop 439.5WP was recommended to reduce disease severity and yield loss of the plant. Keywords: Cercospora leaf spot, frequency, hot pepper, and trust-Cymocop 439.5WP DOI: 10.7176/JNSR/12-9-01 Publication date: May 31 st 2021

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungicides differed significantly from the untreated check for disease severity.

Taxon
hot pepperCapsicum frutescense1
Treatment
both fungicidese0
Interactor
Cercospora capcisie1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum frutescens
Capsicum frutescens · TaxonThe original uploader was Matthäus Wander at German Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both fungicides sprayed control Cercospora leaf spot which is significantly different from untreated check in disease severity, area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and marketable yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cercospora leaf spot is caused by Cercospora capcisi is an important disease which reduces the productivity of hot pepper (Capsicum spp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungicides differed significantly from the untreated check for AUDPC.

Taxon
hot pepperCapsicum frutescense1
Treatment
both fungicidese0
Interactor
Cercospora capcisie2pathogen
Outcome
area under disease progress curve (AUDPC)e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum frutescens
Capsicum frutescens · TaxonThe original uploader was Matthäus Wander at German Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both fungicides sprayed control Cercospora leaf spot which is significantly different from untreated check in disease severity, area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and marketable yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of hot pepper (Capsicum spp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cercospora leaf spot is caused by Cercospora capcisi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungicides differed significantly from untreated check for marketable yield.

Taxon
hot pepperCapsicum frutescense1
Treatment
both fungicidese0
Interactor
Cercospora capcisie2pathogen
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum frutescens
Capsicum frutescens · TaxonThe original uploader was Matthäus Wander at German Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both fungicides sprayed control Cercospora leaf spot which is significantly different from untreated check in disease severity, area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and marketable yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of hot pepper (Capsicum spp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cercospora leaf spot is caused by Cercospora capcisi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray frequencies did not differ significantly for disease severity, AUDPC, or marketable yield.

Taxon
hot pepperCapsicum frutescense1
Treatment
application frequencies of fungicidese0
Outcome
disease severity, AUDPC and marketable yielde0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
application frequencies of fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum frutescens
Capsicum frutescens · TaxonThe original uploader was Matthäus Wander at German Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application frequencies of fungicides were not significantly different on disease severity, AUDPC and marketable yield of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of hot pepper (Capsicum spp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trust Cymocop reduced relative yield loss by 26.67% over the control.

Taxon
hot pepperCapsicum frutescense0
Treatment
Trust Cymocop 439.5WPe0
Outcome
relative yield losse0
Direction
reducese0
Value
26.67%e0
Comparator
control checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum frutescens
Capsicum frutescens · TaxonThe original uploader was Matthäus Wander at German Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Trust Cymocop 439.5WP reduces 26.67% relative yield loss of hot pepper over control check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic analysis found fungicide application feasible.

Taxon
hot pepperCapsicum frutescense1
Treatment
fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
feasibility of fungicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum frutescens
Capsicum frutescens · TaxonThe original uploader was Matthäus Wander at German Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An economic analysis was done for fungicides and shows feasibility of fungicide application for management of Cercospora leaf spot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1358 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of hot pepper (Capsicum spp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–138 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend two Trust-Cymocop 439.5WP applications to reduce disease severity and yield loss.

Taxon
hot pepperCapsicum frutescense1
Treatment
Two times application of Trust-Cymocop 439.5WPe0
Outcome
Two times application of Trust-Cymocop 439.5WPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum frutescens
Capsicum frutescens · TaxonThe original uploader was Matthäus Wander at German Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two times application of Trust-Cymocop 439.5WP was recommended to reduce disease severity and yield loss of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1562 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of hot pepper (Capsicum spp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–138 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Capsicum frutescens (hot pepper)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.