Paper · 2019 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Effects of chicken manure and summer ploughing on root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) management in cantaloupe (Cucumis melovar.cantalupensis)

Hadi Karimipour Fard; Karim Saeidi; Nazanin Doryanizadeh

8
claims
30
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A 2-year trial was performed in two regions of Ardestan (Iran, Isfahan province) to investigate effects of chicken manure and summer ploughing on root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) in two infested cantaloupe fields. Before planting cantaloupe, summer ploughing and chicken manure (3, 6 and 9 T/ha) separately and combination of these treatments were applied in nematode-infested fields. At the harvest time, the number of galls, egg masses, gall and egg mass indices and multiplication rate were determined. Also, quantitative and qualitative parameters of cantaloupes in different treatments were evaluated. The results revealed that double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manure treatments had the best effects on the control of M. javanica. By applying this treatment, reduction of the egg mass number, gall number, total population in root and soil and reproduction factor were observed 17, 6.75, 8591 g/root and 3.37 g/root, respectively (compared to control: 132.5, 36.87, 45037 g/root and 23.13, respectively). It also had positive effect on fruit weigh (28 vs. 18.25 kg) and root dry weight (3.8 vs. 2.08 g). According to the results, it seems that decrease in growth parameters and yield reduction due to root-knot nematode could be overcome by incorporation of summer ploughing and applying the chicken manure with the most efficacy in increasing the quantity and quality of the yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double summer ploughing with 6 T/ha chicken manure had the best effect on control of M. javanica compared with control.

Treatment
double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manuree1
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pest
Outcome
control of M. javanicae1
Direction
best effectse1
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Ardestan (Iran, Isfahan province)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management in cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“A 2-year trial was performed in two regions of Ardestan (Iran, Isfahan province)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manure treatments had the best effects on the control of M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–769 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control: 132.5, 36.87, 45037 g/root and 23.13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double summer ploughing with 6 T/ha chicken manure reduced the egg mass number to 17, against 132.5 in control.

Treatment
double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manuree0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
egg mass numbere1
Direction
reductione1
Value
17e1
Qualifier
132.5e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management in cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manure treatments had the best effects on the control of M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction of the egg mass number, gall number, total population in root and soil and reproduction factor were observed 17, 6.75, 8591 g/root and 3.37 g/root, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–969 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control: 132.5, 36.87, 45037 g/root and 23.13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double summer ploughing with 6 T/ha chicken manure reduced gall number to 6.75, against 36.87 in control.

Treatment
double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manuree0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
gall numbere1
Direction
reductione1
Value
6.75e1
Qualifier
36.87e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management in cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manure treatments had the best effects on the control of M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction of the egg mass number, gall number, total population in root and soil and reproduction factor were observed 17, 6.75, 8591 g/root and 3.37 g/root, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–969 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control: 132.5, 36.87, 45037 g/root and 23.13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double summer ploughing with 6 T/ha chicken manure reduced total population in root and soil to 8591 g/root, against 45037 g/root in control.

Treatment
double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manuree0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
total population in root and soile1
Direction
reductione1
Value
8591 g/roote1
Qualifier
45037 g/roote2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management in cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manure treatments had the best effects on the control of M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction of the egg mass number, gall number, total population in root and soil and reproduction factor were observed 17, 6.75, 8591 g/root and 3.37 g/root, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–969 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control: 132.5, 36.87, 45037 g/root and 23.13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double summer ploughing with 6 T/ha chicken manure reduced reproduction factor to 3.37 g/root, against 23.13 in control.

Treatment
double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manuree0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
reproduction factore1
Direction
reductione1
Value
3.37 g/roote1
Qualifier
23.13e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management in cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manure treatments had the best effects on the control of M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction of the egg mass number, gall number, total population in root and soil and reproduction factor were observed 17, 6.75, 8591 g/root and 3.37 g/root, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–969 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control: 132.5, 36.87, 45037 g/root and 23.13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double summer ploughing with 6 T/ha chicken manure had a positive effect on fruit weight, 28 kg against 18.25 kg in control.

Treatment
double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manuree0
Outcome
fruit weighe1
Direction
positive effecte1
Value
28 vs. 18.25 kge1
Qualifier
18.25 kge1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management in cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manure treatments had the best effects on the control of M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“It also had positive effect on fruit weigh (28 vs. 18.25 kg) and root dry weight (3.8 vs. 2.08 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1142 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control: 132.5, 36.87, 45037 g/root and 23.13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double summer ploughing with 6 T/ha chicken manure had a positive effect on root dry weight, 3.8 g against 2.08 g in control.

Treatment
double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manuree0
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
positive effecte1
Value
3.8 vs. 2.08 ge1
Qualifier
2.08 ge1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management in cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“double summer ploughing in combination with 6 T/ha chicken manure treatments had the best effects on the control of M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“It also had positive effect on fruit weigh (28 vs. 18.25 kg) and root dry weight (3.8 vs. 2.08 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1142 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control: 132.5, 36.87, 45037 g/root and 23.13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1042 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating summer ploughing and chicken manure is recommended to increase quantity and quality of cantaloupe yield under nematode pressure.

Treatment
incorporation of summer ploughing and applying the chicken manuree0
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
quantity and quality of the yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“management in cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“decrease in growth parameters and yield reduction due to root-knot nematode could be overcome by incorporation of summer ploughing and applying the chicken manure with the most efficacy in increasing the quantity and quality of the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1421 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 57 positive, 17 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.