Paper · 2010 · Journal of Crop and Weed

Identification of critical stages of weed competition and effect of weed competition in banana variety Palayankodan.

P. Prameela

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of weed competition and to identify the most critical stage of weed competition in banana. The treatments consisted of different weeding schedules as well as an unweeded control. It was found that early vegetative phase of growth of banana especially up to 3ni/6 1 h month after transplanting and bunch development stage are the critical stages of banana at which yield is affected. Cost benefit ratio indicated that frequent weeding, withholding weeding during the first three MAP as well as during 6 to 9 MAP is less economical compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent weeding was less economical than other schedules.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
frequent weedinge0
Outcome
Cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
less economicale0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Cost benefit ratio indicated that frequent weeding, withholding weeding during the first three MAP as well as during 6 to 9 MAP is less economical compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.