Paper · 2020 · Plants

The Effect of Organic Mulching and Irrigation on the Weed Species Composition and the Soil Weed Seed Bank of Tomato

Renáta Petrikovszki; Mihály Zalai; Franciska Tóthné Bogdányi; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mulching is a management technique to control weeds in organic and integrated tomato production. Our experiment was designed to investigate the impact of organic mulch combined with irrigation on the weed species composition and weed seed bank of open-field tomato. For three consecutive years (2016-2018), treatment of microplots included mulch only, irrigation only, mulch and irrigation combined, and the untreated control. Marginal microplots (bordered by the surrounding mown grassland) were distinguished from inner microplots to check margin effect. We collected soil samples from different depths and let the weed seeds germinate in a greenhouse. Germinated weed seedlings were counted and identified. The number of weeds, and time needed for weeding was reduced by mulching, temperature, sampling date, and the succession of the study years. Irrigation, on the other hand, had no effect on weeding time. Margin effect and year had the highest influence on weed species composition. Regarding seed bank, year and mulching had the highest influence. The importance of other variables remained low, with mulching being the strongest explained variable. Regardless of treatments, weed composition of the study area was transformed during the three-year study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching reduced weed numbers and weeding time.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
number of weeds, and time needed for weedinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of weeds, and time needed for weeding was reduced by mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation had no effect on weeding time.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
weeding timee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation, on the other hand, had no effect on weeding time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–911 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Margin position and year had the largest effects on weed species composition.

Outcome
weed species compositione0
Direction
highest influencee0
Setting
Margine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Margin effect and year had the highest influence on weed species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year and mulching had the largest effects on the weed seed bank.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
seed banke0
Direction
highest influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding seed bank, year and mulching had the highest influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed composition changed over three study years regardless of treatment.

Outcome
weed compositione0
Direction
transformede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of treatments, weed composition of the study area was transformed during the three-year study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1263 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑

mulching · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 49 positive, 6 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.