Paper · 2011 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Gene effects for fruit yield and its component traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) using generation means

Jagesh Kumar Tiwari; A D Munshi; Ravinder Kumar; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Generation mean analysis in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) was carried out during 2006–07 to study gene effects for fruit yield and its components in interacting and non-interacting crosses using 3-parameter model and 6-parameter model, respectively. For this purpose, six promising parents selected out of 17 genotypes were crossed in a half-diallel fashion to generate 15 F1s. Top five high-yielding F1s were advanced to F2s, B1s and B2s. The estimates of gene effects obtained through analysis of six generations revealed preponderance of both additive and dominance effects for fruit weight, fruit length and fruit diameter. Epistatic interactions were observed for earliness, number of fruits/plant and yield/plant. However, scaling test was non-significant for fruit weight and length in all the five crosses showing absence of epistasis in the control of these characters. Some crosses showed duplicate type of interaction while others showed complementary epistasis. For instance, for fruit yield/ plant, CRC 8 × Pusa Uday and CHC 2 × DC 1 showed complementary epistasis, which would increase the heterosis in positive direction. The magnitude and direction of the gene effects varied from cross to cross. Thus, characters such as fruit weight and fruit length which are governed by entirely additive components could be improved through individual selection while for days to first female flower opening, days to first fruit harvest, number of fruits/plant and fruit yield/plant showing predominant dominance gene effects and interaction effects, biparental mating and recurrent selection would exploit both additive and non-additive type of gene effects efficiently.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both additive and dominance effects predominated for cucumber fruit weight, length and diameter.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
fruit weight, fruit length and fruit diametere1
Qualifier
additive and dominance effectse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“preponderance of both additive and dominance effects for fruit weight, fruit length and fruit diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–626 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epistatic interactions were observed for cucumber earliness, fruit number and yield per plant.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
epistatic interactionse1
Qualifier
earliness, number of fruits/plant and yield/plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Epistatic interactions were observed for earliness, number of fruits/plant and yield/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Scaling tests were non-significant for fruit weight and length in all five crosses, supporting absence of epistasis for those traits.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
absence of epistasise1
Qualifier
fruit weight and length in all the five crossese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“scaling test was non-significant for fruit weight and length in all the five crosses showing absence of epistasis in the control of these characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some cucumber crosses showed duplicate interaction.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
duplicate type of interactione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Some crosses showed duplicate type of interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–928 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other cucumber crosses showed complementary epistasis.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
complementary epistasise1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“others showed complementary epistasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–972 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CRC 8 × Pusa Uday cross showed complementary epistasis for fruit yield per plant that would increase heterosis.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
CRC 8 × Pusa Udaye1
Outcome
complementary epistasise1
Qualifier
fruit yield/ plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“for fruit yield/ plant, CRC 8 × Pusa Uday and CHC 2 × DC 1 showed complementary epistasis, which would increase the heterosis in positive direction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CHC 2 × DC 1 cross showed complementary epistasis for fruit yield per plant that would increase heterosis.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
CHC 2 × DC 1e1
Outcome
complementary epistasise1
Qualifier
fruit yield/ plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“for fruit yield/ plant, CRC 8 × Pusa Uday and CHC 2 × DC 1 showed complementary epistasis, which would increase the heterosis in positive direction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude and direction of cucumber gene effects varied among crosses.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
gene effects varied from cross to crosse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The magnitude and direction of the gene effects varied from cross to cross”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1211 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Individual selection was recommended for cucumber fruit weight and length.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
individual selectione1
Qualifier
fruit weight and fruit lengthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit weight and fruit length which are governed by entirely additive components could be improved through individual selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1365 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Biparental mating and recurrent selection were recommended for cucumber flowering, harvest timing, fruit number and yield traits.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
biparental mating and recurrent selectione1
Qualifier
days to first female flower opening, days to first fruit harvest, number of fruits/plant and fruit yield/plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“for days to first female flower opening, days to first fruit harvest, number of fruits/plant and fruit yield/plant showing predominant dominance gene effects and interaction effects, biparental mating and recurrent selection would exploit both additive and non-additive type of gene effects efficiently”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1674 · show in text ↑