Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Response of potato to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers at Assosa, western Ethiopia

Habtam Setu; Tesfaye Mitiku

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Low soil fertility is one of the critical factors limiting the productivity of potatoes ( Solanum tuberosum L.) in western Ethiopia. The field experiment was conducted in the 2015 and 2016 cropping seasons to elucidate the response of potato yield, yield components, tuber quality to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer, and their economic benefit. The treatment comprised five levels of nitrogen (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg N ha −1 ) and five levels of phosphorus (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 ). The experiment was laid out as a randomized complete block design in a factorial (5 × 5) arrangement and we replicated the treatments three times. The results revealed that the interaction of nitrogen and phosphorus did not affect growth, yield, and quality parameters of potato. However, nitrogen alone affected plant height, tuber number per plant, number of stems per hill, and marketable and total tuber yield, but not tuber quality parameters. The optimum yields of both marketable (25.5 Mg ha −1 ) and total (28.4 Mg ha −1 ) tuber yields were observed in the application of 150 kg N ha −1 . Phosphorus treatments had no response for most of the yield, yield components, or tuber quality parameters. Applications of 150 kg N ha −1 provided a maximum gross margin ($5138.68 or 141,773.55 Ethiopian Birr [ETB] ha −1 ) with a 79.4% gross profit margin and the highest benefit‐cost ratio (4.86).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus interaction did not affect potato growth, yield or quality.

Treatment
interaction of nitrogen and phosphoruse0
Outcome
growth, yield, and quality parameterse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction of nitrogen and phosphorus did not affect growth, yield, and quality parameters of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen affected potato plant height, tuber number, stems per hill, and marketable and total yield.

Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
plant height, tuber number per plant, number of stems per hill, and marketable and total tuber yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen alone affected plant height, tuber number per plant, number of stems per hill, and marketable and total tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen did not affect tuber quality.

Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
tuber quality parameterse0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen alone affected plant height, tuber number per plant, number of stems per hill, and marketable and total tuber yield, but not tuber quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150 kg N ha −1, marketable tuber yield reached 25.5 Mg ha −1.

Treatment
150 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
marketablee0
Direction
optimume0
Value
25.5 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum yields of both marketable (25.5 Mg ha −1 ) and total (28.4 Mg ha −1 ) tuber yields were observed in the application of 150 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150 kg N ha −1, total tuber yield reached 28.4 Mg ha −1.

Treatment
150 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
totale0
Direction
optimume0
Value
28.4 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum yields of both marketable (25.5 Mg ha −1 ) and total (28.4 Mg ha −1 ) tuber yields were observed in the application of 150 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus generally produced no response in yield, yield components, or tuber quality.

Treatment
Phosphorus treatmentse0
Outcome
yield, yield components, or tuber quality parameterse0
Direction
no responsee0
Qualifier
moste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus treatments had no response for most of the yield, yield components, or tuber quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kg N ha −1 rate gave the maximum gross margin of $5138.68 or 141,773.55 ETB ha −1.

Treatment
150 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
gross margine0
Direction
maximume0
Value
$5138.68 or 141,773.55 Ethiopian Birr [ETB] ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of 150 kg N ha −1 provided a maximum gross margin ($5138.68 or 141,773.55 Ethiopian Birr [ETB] ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kg N ha −1 rate gave a 79.4% gross profit margin.

Treatment
150 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
gross profit margine0
Value
79.4%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of 150 kg N ha −1 provided a maximum gross margin ($5138.68 or 141,773.55 Ethiopian Birr [ETB] ha −1 ) with a 79.4% gross profit margin and the highest benefit‐cost ratio (4.86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kg N ha −1 rate gave the highest benefit cost ratio, 4.86.

Treatment
150 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
benefit‐cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.86e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of 150 kg N ha −1 provided a maximum gross margin ($5138.68 or 141,773.55 Ethiopian Birr [ETB] ha −1 ) with a 79.4% gross profit margin and the highest benefit‐cost ratio (4.86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

phosphorus · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.