Paper · 2019 · Journal of Productivity and Development

INFLUENCE OF SOME SQUASH CULTIVARS AND GROWTH STIMULANTS ON FLOWERING, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY AT AUTUMN – WINTER SEASON UNDER OPEN FIELD CONDITIONS

Rashad, Ahmed; Fekry, Wafaa Adel; Wahdan, Helmy

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This investigation was conducted at the Experimental Farm, Fac. Tech. and Develop. (Gazala region – Zagazig), Zagazig Univ., Sharkia Governorate under open field during the two fall – winter seasons of 2015/2016 and 2016/2017, to study the effect of three cultivars of squash ( Eskandarany, Revera and Azyad) and foliar spray treatments with, yeast extract at the rate of 3 and 6gl-1 ,as well as potassium silicate at the rate of 2 and 4gl-1 plus control (tap water)and their interactions on flowering expression, i.e., number of male and female flowers plant-1, sex ratio and femalness percentage, yield and its components (number of fruits plant-1 , fruit fresh weight, and dry matter percentage, total fruit yield plot-1 and relative yield), as well as fruit quality, i.e., fruit physical characters (both of fruit length and diameter) and fruit chemical composition (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content, protein and total carbohydrates percentage). Results showed the superiority of the two tested cultivars Azyad and Revera at all studied characteristics compared with Eskandarany cv. Spraying with yeast extract or potassium silicate significantly increased most parameters of flowering, fruit yield and quality attributes of squash than control treatment . Moreover, spraying plants with potassium silicate at rate of 4gl-1 or yeast extract at 6gl-1 significantly surpassed compared with the other foliar treatments and control in this respect. The best results of the interaction treatments for flowering, yield and fruit parameters were recorded by the two cultivars Azyad or Revera combined with the foliar spray by 4gl-1 of potassium silicate or 6gl-1 of yeast extract which recorded increased in most of all the mentioned studied parameters. Hence, each of these treatments could be recommended for enhancement flowering, yield and fruit quality of squash plants with low cost production when planted in open field at fall – winter season under the same conditions of this experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azyad and Revera were superior to Eskandarany cv in all studied characteristics of squash

Taxon
squashe0
Material
Azyad and Reverae1
Outcome
all studied characteristicse1
Direction
superioritye1
Comparator
Eskandarany cve1

Verbatim

e0

“three cultivars of squash ( Eskandarany, Revera and Azyad)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–308 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed the superiority of the two tested cultivars Azyad and Revera at all studied characteristics compared with Eskandarany cv”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with yeast extract or potassium silicate significantly increased most flowering, fruit yield and quality parameters of squash compared with control

Taxon
squashe2
Treatment
Spraying with yeast extract or potassium silicatee2
Outcome
most parameters of flowering, fruit yield and quality attributese2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
control treatmente2

Verbatim

e2

“Spraying with yeast extract or potassium silicate significantly increased most parameters of flowering, fruit yield and quality attributes of squash than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium silicate at 4 g/l or yeast extract at 6 g/l significantly surpassed the other foliar treatments and control in flowering, fruit yield and quality of squash

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
potassium silicate at rate of 4gl-1 or yeast extract at 6gl-1e3
Outcome
most parameters of flowering, fruit yield and quality attributese2
Direction
surpassede3
Comparator
the other foliar treatments and controle3

Verbatim

e0

“three cultivars of squash ( Eskandarany, Revera and Azyad)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–308 · show in text ↑
e2

“Spraying with yeast extract or potassium silicate significantly increased most parameters of flowering, fruit yield and quality attributes of squash than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1268 · show in text ↑
e3

“spraying plants with potassium silicate at rate of 4gl-1 or yeast extract at 6gl-1 significantly surpassed compared with the other foliar treatments and control in this respect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1457 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best interaction treatments of Azyad or Revera with potassium silicate or yeast extract foliar spray increased most of the studied flowering, yield and fruit parameters of squash

Taxon
squashe0
Material
Azyad or Reverae4
Treatment
foliar spray by 4gl-1 of potassium silicate or 6gl-1 of yeast extracte4
Outcome
most of all the mentioned studied parameterse4
Direction
increasede4

Verbatim

e0

“three cultivars of squash ( Eskandarany, Revera and Azyad)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–308 · show in text ↑
e4

“The best results of the interaction treatments for flowering, yield and fruit parameters were recorded by the two cultivars Azyad or Revera combined with the foliar spray by 4gl-1 of potassium silicate or 6gl-1 of yeast extract which recorded increased in most of all the mentioned studied parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1759 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend the tested foliar treatments for enhancing flowering, yield and fruit quality of squash grown in open field at low cost in fall-winter under the experiment conditions

Taxon
squashe5
Outcome
enhancement flowering, yield and fruit qualitye5
Setting
open fielde5

Verbatim

e5

“Hence, each of these treatments could be recommended for enhancement flowering, yield and fruit quality of squash plants with low cost production when planted in open field at fall – winter season under the same conditions of this experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–2002 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · quality: general · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: general · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: general · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.