Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Changes in the Weed Seed Bank in Long-Term Establishment Methods Trials under Rice-Wheat Cropping System

Prashant Sharma; Manoj Kumar Singh; Kamlesh Verma; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The rice–wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains is the backbone of food security in India. In the 1990s, due to the scarcity of resources, the traditional Crop Establishment (CE) method shifted from Conventional Till Puddle Transplanted Rice (CTPTR) to CT Direct Seeded Rice (CTDSR) and Zero-Till DSR (ZTDSR) in paddy; and in wheat, from Conventional Till Wheat (CTW) to Zero Till Wheat (ZTW), with residue retention in rice (RRR) or in both rice and wheat (RRRW). Shift in CE methods led to change in Weed Seed Bank (WSB) dynamics and ultimately affected the weed management program. After five years of field trials, soil samples were drawn as per 2-factors factorial randomized block design. Factor-I comprised 4-CE methods, whereas factor-II consisted of 3-soil depths (0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm). Results showed CTPTR-CTW and ZTDSR-ZTW (RRRW) record the highest seed bank (SB) of grasses, sedges and BLWs as total weeds, in general; and predominant weeds like Echinochloa spp., Ammania baccifera, Commelina benghalensis and Digitaria sanguinalis, in particular. It also showed the higher species richness (DMg) and Shannon–Weaver (H’) indices. CTDSR-CTW and CTDSR-ZTW (RRR) show the lowest WSB and at par with Shannon–Weaver (H’) index; further, lowest species richness (DMg) under CTDSR-CTW. Species Evenness (J’) and Simpson index (λ) vary non-significantly with CE methods. Furthermore, 0–10 cm soil depth showed the highest SB of different category of total weed, predominant weeds as well as higher values of DMg, H’, and λ; whereas reverse trend was observed in Whittaker Statistic (βW). Interaction between CE methods and soil depth revealed most of WSB lying on the top layer in case of ZTDSR-ZTW (RRRW) and CTDSR-ZTW (RRR); while CTPTR-CTW showed almost uniform WSB distribution, and in case of CTDSR-CTW, a gradual decrease in WSB with soil depth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTPTR-CTW had among the highest seed banks of grass, sedge and broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
CTPTR-CTWe0
Outcome
seed bank (SB) of grasses, sedges and BLWs as total weedse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CTPTR-CTW and ZTDSR-ZTW (RRRW) record the highest seed bank (SB) of grasses, sedges and BLWs as total weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZTDSR-ZTW (RRRW) had among the highest seed banks of grass, sedge and broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
ZTDSR-ZTW (RRRW)e0
Outcome
seed bank (SB) of grasses, sedges and BLWs as total weedse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CTPTR-CTW and ZTDSR-ZTW (RRRW) record the highest seed bank (SB) of grasses, sedges and BLWs as total weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTDSR-CTW had among the lowest weed seed banks.

Treatment
CTDSR-CTWe0
Outcome
WSBe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CTDSR-CTW and CTDSR-ZTW (RRR) show the lowest WSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTDSR-ZTW (RRR) had among the lowest weed seed banks.

Treatment
CTDSR-ZTW (RRR)e0
Outcome
WSBe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CTDSR-CTW and CTDSR-ZTW (RRR) show the lowest WSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species richness was lowest under CTDSR-CTW.

Treatment
CTDSR-CTWe0
Outcome
species richness (DMg)e0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest species richness (DMg) under CTDSR-CTW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Species evenness and Simpson index varied nonsignificantly with establishment methods.

Treatment
CE methodse0
Outcome
Species Evenness (J’) and Simpson index (λ)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Species Evenness (J’) and Simpson index (λ) vary non-significantly with CE methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0–10 cm soil layer had the highest weed seed bank.

Outcome
SB of different category of total weed, predominant weedse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
0–10 cm soil depthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0–10 cm soil depth showed the highest SB of different category of total weed, predominant weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed seed banks lay mainly in the top layer under ZTDSR-ZTW (RRRW) and CTDSR-ZTW (RRR).

Outcome
WSB lying on the top layere0
Setting
top layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of WSB lying on the top layer in case of ZTDSR-ZTW (RRRW) and CTDSR-ZTW (RRR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTPTR-CTW had nearly uniform weed seed bank distribution across depths.

Treatment
CTPTR-CTWe0
Outcome
uniform WSB distributione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CTPTR-CTW showed almost uniform WSB distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed seed bank gradually decreased with depth under CTDSR-CTW.

Treatment
CTDSR-CTWe0
Outcome
WSBe0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of CTDSR-CTW, a gradual decrease in WSB with soil depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑