Paper · 1987 · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL

Ceramic Fiber as Filter Aid in Determination of Acid-Insoluble Lignin in Forages

Ralph E McQueen

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Ceramic fiber was found to be a suitable alternative to asbestos in determining the acid-insoluble lignin content of 59 forages by AOAC official final action method 7.074-7.077. Replacement of asbestos is necessary because it is a recognized carcinogen. Blank values for ceramic fiber were less than those for asbestos, and repeatability of duplicate lignin determinations was similar for both filter aids. Lignin content (%) by the ceramic fiber method (X), over the range 0.74-12.63%, was highly correlated (0.997) with that using the asbestos method (Y) by the relationship: Y = 1.008X - 0.093. Correction of forage lignin estimates using ceramic fiber is necessary if they are compared with those obtained using asbestos because of the negative Mas of 0.093%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ceramic fiber is a suitable alternative to asbestos for determining acid-insoluble lignin content in forages.

Taxon
foragese1
Outcome
acid-insoluble lignin contente1
Comparator
asbestose1

Verbatim

e1

“Ceramic fiber was found to be a suitable alternative to asbestos in determining the acid-insoluble lignin content of 59 forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blank values for ceramic fiber are lower than those for asbestos.

Taxon
foragese1
Outcome
Blank valuese2
Direction
less thane2
Comparator
asbestose2

Verbatim

e1

“Ceramic fiber was found to be a suitable alternative to asbestos in determining the acid-insoluble lignin content of 59 forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“Blank values for ceramic fiber were less than those for asbestos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–327 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of duplicate lignin determinations is similar for ceramic fiber and asbestos.

Taxon
foragese1
Outcome
repeatability of duplicate lignin determinationse3
Direction
similare3
Comparator
asbestose2

Verbatim

e1

“Ceramic fiber was found to be a suitable alternative to asbestos in determining the acid-insoluble lignin content of 59 forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“Blank values for ceramic fiber were less than those for asbestos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–327 · show in text ↑
e3

“repeatability of duplicate lignin determinations was similar for both filter aids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–414 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ceramic fiber lignin content is highly correlated with asbestos lignin content (r = 0.997) over 0.74-12.63%.

Taxon
foragese1
Outcome
Lignin content (%)e4
Direction
highly correlatede4
Value
0.997e4
Qualifier
over the range 0.74-12.63%e4
Comparator
asbestos methode4

Verbatim

e1

“Ceramic fiber was found to be a suitable alternative to asbestos in determining the acid-insoluble lignin content of 59 forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lignin content (%) by the ceramic fiber method (X), over the range 0.74-12.63%, was highly correlated (0.997) with that using the asbestos method (Y)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–565 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Forage lignin estimates from the ceramic fiber method must be corrected if they are compared with asbestos-based estimates.

Taxon
foragee5
Outcome
Correction of forage lignin estimatese5
Qualifier
if they are compared with those obtained using asbestose5

Verbatim

e5

“Correction of forage lignin estimates using ceramic fiber is necessary if they are compared with those obtained using asbestos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–733 · show in text ↑