Paper · 2020 · Epsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton)

Partners in crime – How cabbage seed weevil assists brassica pod midge in damaging pods of winter oilseed rape in fields in Southern Sweden

Sarah Heithausen

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The brassica pod midge (Dasineura brassicae) has emerged as an important pest causing problems in Winter Oilseed Rape (WOSR) (Brassica napus ssp. napus) production in Southern Sweden during recent years. Adult female D. brassicae oviposit into WOSR pods. After hatching from the eggs, the D. brassicae larvae feed on the inside of the pod, causing deformation and premature opening of the pod, which can result in dramatic yield losses. As the ovipositor of the adult female D. brassicae is too weak to pierce WOSR pod walls, oviposition is mostly done in pre-damaged WOSR pods. Most of these damages that are utilized for oviposition by D. brassicae are caused by the cabbage seed weevil (Ceutorhynchus obstrictus). The weevil feeds on the WOSR pods, thereby causing damages that facilitate oviposition by D. brassicae. Pest control measures are therefore directed against C. obstrictus as the brassica pod midge is extremely difficult to control. More information about the phenology and the combined effect of the two insect species is needed in order to create pest control as sustainable as possible. In this study, C. obstrictus and D. brassicae were monitored during six weeks from May until June 2019 in 20 different WOSR fields around Scania, the southernmost province of Sweden. Different active (visual count) and passive (yellow pan traps, yellow sticky traps) monitoring methods were used to assess the abundance of C. obstrictus and D. brassicae in the 20 WOSR fields and the effect of their presence on the amount of pod damage by D. brassicae. Trap samples were collected weekly and analyzed in the laboratory. At the end of the study period, pod damage was assessed in each field. The number of captured insects of the two species was very low in comparison with previous studies from the last two years, so was the percentage of pod damage. Phenology of C. obstrictus deviated from the expected pattern: Usually the cabbage seed weevil can be observed in a WOSR field earlier in the season than the pod gall midge. In this study C. obstrictus captures peaked 2-3 weeks later than D. brassicae captures, presumably creating less oviposition possibilities for D. brassicae. Nonetheless, the brassica pod midge could benefit from the presence of the cabbage seed weevil – significant correlations between abundance of C. obstrictus monitored in the field border and pod damage caused by D. brassicae inside the field were found. Insecticide treatment showed no effect as the amount of pod damage inside an insecticide-free control zone did not differ from the amount of pod damage outside the insecticide free control zone. Nonetheless, insecticides had been used by the farmers, indicating the need for development of more refined and more rapidly available monitoring and decision tools for farmers to improve IPM strategies for pest control of C. obstrictus and D. brassicae and to reduce insecticide use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captures of both pests and pod damage were low compared with the preceding two years.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
percentage of pod damagee0
Direction
very lowe0
Comparator
previous studies from the last two yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of captured insects of the two species was very low in comparison with previous studies from the last two years, so was the percentage of pod damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1857 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. obstrictus captures peaked 2-3 weeks after D. brassicae captures.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Interactor
C. obstrictusCeutorhynchus obstrictuse0pest
Second interactor
D. brassicaeDasineura brassicaee0pest
Outcome
C. obstrictus capturese0
Direction
latere0
Value
2-3 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceutorhynchus obstrictus
Ceutorhynchus obstrictus · InteractorJanet Graham · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Dasineura brassicae
Dasineura brassicae · Second interactorGilles San Martin [1] from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. obstrictus captures peaked 2-3 weeks later than D. brassicae captures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2047–2119 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Border abundance of C. obstrictus correlated significantly with D. brassicae pod damage inside fields.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Interactor
D. brassicaeDasineura brassicaee0pest
Second interactor
C. obstrictusCeutorhynchus obstrictuse0pest
Outcome
pod damage caused by D. brassicaee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Dasineura brassicae
Dasineura brassicae · InteractorGilles San Martin [1] from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceutorhynchus obstrictus
Ceutorhynchus obstrictus · Second interactorJanet Graham · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant correlations between abundance of C. obstrictus monitored in the field border and pod damage caused by D. brassicae inside the field were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2287–2442 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod damage did not differ between insecticide-free and treated zones.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
Insecticide treatmente0
Outcome
amount of pod damagee0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
insecticide-free control zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticide treatment showed no effect as the amount of pod damage inside an insecticide-free control zone did not differ from the amount of pod damage outside the insecticide free control zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2444–2637 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.