Paper · 2020 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

In‐season potato yield prediction with active optical sensors

Ahmed A. Zaeen; Lakesh Sharma; Ahmed Jasim; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Crop yield prediction is a critical measurement, especially in the time when parts of the world are suffering from farming issues. Yield forecasting gives an alert regarding economic trading, food production monitoring, and global food security. This research was conducted to investigate whether active optical sensors could be utilized for potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) yield prediction at the mid.le of the growing season. Three potato cultivars (Russet Burbank, Superior, and Shepody) were planted and six rates of N (0, 56, 112, 168, 224, and 280 kg ha −1 ), ammonium sulfate, which was replaced by ammonium nitrate in the 2nd year, were applied on 11 sites in a randomized complete block design, with four replications. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and chlorophyll index (CI) measurements were obtained weekly from the active optical sensors, GreenSeeker (GS) and Crop Circle (CC). The 168 kg N ha −1 produced the maximum potato yield. Indices measurements obtained at the 16th and 20th leaf growth stages were significantly correlated with tuber yield. Multiple regression analysis (potato yield as a dependent variable and vegetation indices, NDVI and CI, as independent variables) could make a remarkable improvement to the accuracy of the prediction model and increase the determination coefficient. The exponential and linear models showed a better fit of the data. Soil organic matter content increased the yield significantly but did not affect the prediction models. The 18th and 20th leaf growth stages are the best time to use the sensors for yield prediction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

168 kg N ha −1 produced the maximum potato yield.

Treatment
168 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 168 kg N ha −1 produced the maximum potato yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–968 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Indices at the 16th and 20th leaf stages correlated significantly with tuber yield.

Organ / stage
16th and 20th leaf growth stagese0
Outcome
tuber yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indices measurements obtained at the 16th and 20th leaf growth stages were significantly correlated with tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple regression using NDVI and CI improved prediction accuracy and determination coefficient.

Outcome
accuracy of the prediction model and increase the determination coefficiente0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multiple regression analysis (potato yield as a dependent variable and vegetation indices, NDVI and CI, as independent variables) could make a remarkable improvement to the accuracy of the prediction model and increase the determination coefficient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1336 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exponential and linear models fit the data better.

Outcome
better fit of the datae0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The exponential and linear models showed a better fit of the data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter content significantly increased potato yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Soil organic matter contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic matter content increased the yield significantly but did not affect the prediction models.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter content did not affect prediction models.

Outcome
prediction modelse0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
Soil organic matter contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic matter content increased the yield significantly but did not affect the prediction models.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify the 18th and 20th leaf stages as best for sensor prediction.

Organ / stage
18th and 20th leaf growth stagese0
Outcome
best time to use the sensors for yield predictione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 18th and 20th leaf growth stages are the best time to use the sensors for yield prediction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.