Paper · 2020 · Crop Science

Economic returns of one versus two fungicide applications in oklahoma winter wheat

Branden H. Watson; Robert M. Hunger; David A. Marburger

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Fungicides protect winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) yield potential by managing foliar fungal diseases, but little information comparing one vs. two applications is available for the US southern Great Plains. Field experiments conducted from 2016–2018 at two Oklahoma locations (Apache and Stillwater) used two winter wheat cultivars (‘Gallagher’ and ‘Bentley’) and four fungicide application timings (control, Feekes 6, Feekes 9, and Feekes 6 + 9). Disease levels were highest during 2017 due to leaf rust. Dry conditions during 2018 limited disease development overall. Fungicide applications resulted in significantly higher yields in three of eight year × location × cultivar comparisons, all during 2017. The Feekes 6 + 9 treatment only showed the highest grain yield for the leaf rust‐susceptible cultivar Bentley at Stillwater that season. Partial profit was also examined by year, location, and cultivar using four fungicide cost scenarios at three grain sale prices. Only 22 of 96 comparisons showed significant positive partial profit from fungicide use, and all occurred at Stillwater during 2017. Two fungicide applications had the highest profit in 4 of the 22 comparisons for the cultivar Bentley. However, a single application of a low‐cost fungicide was most often among the highest profitable fungicide treatments, depending when higher disease levels were present. Partial profits from one and two fungicide applications were not significant or significantly negative when disease levels were low. Knowledge of cultivar disease susceptibility and disease scouting need to be considered to economically justify one or two fungicide applications in Oklahoma winter wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide applications significantly increased yields in three of eight comparisons, all during 2017.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fungicide applicationse2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Value
three of eighte2
Qualifier
all during 2017e2
Setting
Apache and Stillwatere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments conducted from 2016–2018 at two Oklahoma locations (Apache and Stillwater)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicide applications resulted in significantly higher yields in three of eight year × location × cultivar comparisons, all during 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Feekes 6 + 9 treatment gave the highest grain yield for cultivar Bentley at Stillwater in 2017.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Bentleye1
Treatment
Feekes 6 + 9e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
Stillwatere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Feekes 6 + 9 treatment only showed the highest grain yield for the leaf rust‐susceptible cultivar Bentley at Stillwater that season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–858 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 22 of 96 comparisons showed significant positive partial profit from fungicide use, all at Stillwater in 2017.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicide usee1
Outcome
partial profite1
Value
22 of 96 comparisonse1
Setting
Stillwatere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Only 22 of 96 comparisons showed significant positive partial profit from fungicide use, and all occurred at Stillwater during 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two fungicide applications gave the highest profit in 4 of 22 comparisons, all for Bentley.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Bentleye1
Treatment
Two fungicide applicationse1
Outcome
profite1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4 of the 22 comparisonse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two fungicide applications had the highest profit in 4 of the 22 comparisons for the cultivar Bentley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single application of a low-cost fungicide was most often among the most profitable treatments, depending on disease levels.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
single applicatione1
Outcome
profitable fungicide treatmentse1
Direction
most often among the higheste1
Qualifier
depending when higher disease levels were presente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, a single application of a low‐cost fungicide was most often among the highest profitable fungicide treatments, depending when higher disease levels were present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1394 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixednot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial profits from one and two fungicide applications were not significant or significantly negative when disease levels were low.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
one and two fungicide applicationse1
Outcome
Partial profitse1
Qualifier
when disease levels were lowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Partial profits from one and two fungicide applications were not significant or significantly negative when disease levels were low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1527 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease levels were highest in 2017 due to leaf rust.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
leaf ruste1pathogen
Outcome
Disease levelse1
Qualifier
due to leaf ruste1
Setting
during 2017e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disease levels were highest during 2017 due to leaf rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–519 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry conditions in 2018 limited disease development overall.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Dry conditions during 2018e1
Outcome
disease developmente1
Direction
limitede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry conditions during 2018 limited disease development overall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–583 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that cultivar disease susceptibility and disease scouting be considered before choosing one or two fungicide applications.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
economically justify one or two fungicide applicationse1
Qualifier
Knowledge of cultivar disease susceptibility and disease scoutinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Knowledge of cultivar disease susceptibility and disease scouting need to be considered to economically justify one or two fungicide applications in Oklahoma winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1699 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.