Paper · 2000 · Rostlinná výroba

Stability of agronomic traits in sugar beet hybrids.

Ivica Liović; Andrija Kristek

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For achievement of maximum yield, it is needed to use a high yielding and quality genotipe which will kept high production values in different climatic and soil conditions. Due to evaluation of genotype (G) and environmental (E) effects, and their interactions, in the fields experiments in 1996 and 1997 year, on the three location (Osijek, Đakovo, Magadenovac) have been tested production values of the 17 sugar beet genotypes (hybrids). After analysis of variance, on the level of tested years and combined analysis of variance by localities, established differences among environments, genotypes and their interactions had a significant influence on the yield of investigated traits, and therefore a stability analysis was done by estimation of stabiliy parameters. By biometrical methods are estimated: ecovalence (Wi), coefficient of regression (bi) and deviation mean squares (s2di). On basis of the estimated stability parameters, on two-year level, the genotypes of high yield stability were: for root yield - Kristal, Jela and Rita; sugar content - Os Ana, Kawemaja, Marika and Jela; sugar recovery - Dunja, Jela, Kristal and Marika; and for white sugar yield - Jela, Barbara, Dunja and Kristal. By comparison of investigated traits mains and stability parameters, it is obviously that genotypes with the highest yield, regardless of investigated trait, have not a high yield stability. Correlation coefficients (r), for root and white sugar yield, show existence of high significant correlation among mean and bi, and among s2di and Wi. For sugar content is established a significant correlation among mean and s2di and in sugar recovery among s2di and Wi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment, genotype and their interaction significantly influenced yield traits.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
yield of investigated traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences among environments, genotypes and their interactions had a significant influence on the yield of investigated traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kristal, Jela and Rita had high root-yield stability.

Material
Kristal, Jela and Ritae0
Outcome
root yielde0
Qualifier
high yield stabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for root yield - Kristal, Jela and Rita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“the genotypes of high yield stability were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Os Ana, Kawemaja, Marika and Jela had high sugar-content stability.

Material
Os Ana, Kawemaja, Marika and Jelae0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Qualifier
high yield stabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar content - Os Ana, Kawemaja, Marika and Jela”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1092 · show in text ↑
e1

“the genotypes of high yield stability were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dunja, Jela, Kristal and Marika had high sugar-recovery stability.

Material
Dunja, Jela, Kristal and Marikae0
Outcome
sugar recoverye0
Qualifier
high yield stabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar recovery - Dunja, Jela, Kristal and Marika”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“the genotypes of high yield stability were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jela, Barbara, Dunja and Kristal had high white-sugar-yield stability.

Material
Jela, Barbara, Dunja and Kristale0
Outcome
white sugar yielde0
Qualifier
high yield stabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“white sugar yield - Jela, Barbara, Dunja and Kristal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1204 · show in text ↑
e1

“the genotypes of high yield stability were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest-yielding genotypes did not have high yield stability.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
yield stabilitye0
Direction
not a highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes with the highest yield, regardless of investigated trait, have not a high yield stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and white sugar yield showed highly significant correlation between mean and bi.

Outcome
correlation among mean and bie0
Qualifier
root and white sugar yielde0
Comparator
bie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for root and white sugar yield, show existence of high significant correlation among mean and bi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and white sugar yield showed highly significant correlation between s2di and Wi.

Outcome
correlatione0
Qualifier
among s2di and Wie0
Comparator
Wie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for root and white sugar yield, show existence of high significant correlation among mean and bi, and among s2di and Wi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar content showed significant correlation between mean and s2di.

Outcome
correlation among mean and s2die0
Qualifier
sugar contente0
Comparator
s2die0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For sugar content is established a significant correlation among mean and s2di”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar recovery showed significant correlation between s2di and Wi.

Outcome
sugar recoverye0
Qualifier
s2di and Wie0
Comparator
Wie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in sugar recovery among s2di and Wi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑