Paper · 2020 · Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry

Simultaneous Determination of Six Chromones in Saposhnikoviae Radix via Quantitative Analysis of Multicomponents by Single Marker

Jinhua Zhang; Luxiao Chen; Junna Qiu; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A method, quantitative analysis of multicomponents by single marker (QAMS), was established and fully verified based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for simultaneous determination of six chromone indicators of Saposhnikoviae Radix (SR). In the present study, cimifugin (C), 5-O-methylvisamminol (V), hamaudol (H), and their corresponding glycosides, prim-O-glucosylcimifugin (GC), 4′-O- β -D-glucosyl-5-O-methylvisamminol (GV), and sec-O-glucosylhamaudol (GH), were selected as bioactive constituents and indicators for the quality evaluation of SR. GV was chosen as the unique reference standard, and relative correction factors (RCF) between GV and the other five chromones were calculated. The feasibility of QAMS for the analysis of chromones was investigated by comparing with the traditional external standard method (ESM). Furthermore, the method was proven to have accuracy (96.98%–102.50%), repeatability (RSD <3%), stability (RSD <3%), precision (RSD <3%), and desirable linearity ( R 2 ≧0.9999). Subsequently, 55 batches of commercial SR from different regions were determined by QAMS, and their contents were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA), correlation analysis, and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), respectively. Based on the results, a more refined quality standard of commercial SR was proposed: SR was qualified when the total contents of six chromones were greater than 3 mg·g −1 . Furthermore, SR could initially be regarded as a superior medicine when it satisfied both conditions at the same time: the total content of GC, C, GV, V, GH, and H was greater than 8 mg·g −1 , and the proportion of the total content of C, V, and H was greater than 10%. This study demonstrated that the quality of SR could be successfully evaluated by the developed QAMS method; meanwhile, valuable information was provided for improving the quality standard of SR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QAMS accuracy was 96.98%–102.50%.

Taxon
Saposhnikoviae Radixt0
Outcome
accuracye0
Value
96.98%–102.50%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the method was proven to have accuracy (96.98%–102.50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saposhnikoviae Radix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QAMS repeatability was RSD <3%.

Taxon
Saposhnikoviae Radixt0
Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Value
RSD <3%e0

Verbatim

e0

“repeatability (RSD <3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saposhnikoviae Radix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QAMS stability was RSD <3%.

Taxon
Saposhnikoviae Radixt0
Outcome
stabilitye0
Value
RSD <3%e0

Verbatim

e0

“stability (RSD <3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saposhnikoviae Radix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QAMS precision was RSD <3%.

Taxon
Saposhnikoviae Radixt0
Outcome
precisione0
Value
RSD <3%e0

Verbatim

e0

“precision (RSD <3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saposhnikoviae Radix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QAMS linearity was R 2 ≧0.9999.

Taxon
Saposhnikoviae Radixt0
Outcome
linearitye0
Value
R 2 ≧0.9999e0

Verbatim

e0

“desirable linearity ( R 2 ≧0.9999)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saposhnikoviae Radix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The proposed qualification threshold is total six chromones greater than 3 mg·g −1 .

Taxon
Saposhnikoviae Radixt0
Outcome
qualifiede0
Value
3 mg·g −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“SR was qualified when the total contents of six chromones were greater than 3 mg·g −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saposhnikoviae Radix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Superior medicine designation requires total six chromones greater than 8 mg·g −1 and the aglycone proportion greater than 10%.

Taxon
Saposhnikoviae Radixt0
Outcome
superior medicinee0
Value
8 mg·g −1e0
Qualifier
greater than 10%e0

Verbatim

e0

“SR could initially be regarded as a superior medicine when it satisfied both conditions at the same time: the total content of GC, C, GV, V, GH, and H was greater than 8 mg·g −1 , and the proportion of the total content of C, V, and H was greater than 10%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saposhnikoviae Radix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67 · show in text ↑