Paper · 2020 · Forests

Biomass Allocation into Woody Parts and Foliage in Young Common Aspen (Populus tremula L.)—Trees and a Stand-Level Study in the Western Carpathians

Bohdan Konôpka; Jozef Pajtík; Vladimír Šebeň; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Our research of common aspen (Populus tremula L.) focused on the forested mountainous area in central Slovakia. Forest stands (specifically 27 plots from 9 sites) with ages between 2 and 15 years were included in measurements and sampling. Whole tree biomass of aspen individuals was destructively sampled, separated into tree components (leaves, branches, stem, and roots), and then dried and weighed. Subsamples of fresh leaves from three crown parts (upper, middle, and lower) were scanned, dried, and weighed. Allometric biomass models with stem base diameter as an independent variable were derived for individual tree components. Basic foliage traits, i.e., leaf mass, leaf area, and specific leaf area, were modelled with regard to tree size and leaf position within the crown. Moreover, biomass stock of the woody parts and foliage as well as the leaf area index were modelled using mean stand diameter as an independent variable. Foliage traits changed with both tree size and crown part. Biomass models showed that foliage contribution to total tree biomass decreased with tree size. The total foliage area of a tree increased with tree size, reaching its maximum value of about 12 m2 for a tree with a diameter of 120 mm. Leaf area index increased with mean stand diameter, reaching a maximum value of 13.5 m2 m−2. Since no data for biomass allocation for common aspen had been available at either the tree or stand levels, our findings might serve for both theoretical (e.g., modelling of growth processes) and practical (forestry and agro-forestry stakeholders) purposes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allometric biomass models used stem base diameter for individual tree components.

Taxon
Common Aspent0
Outcome
Allometric biomass modelse0
Comparator
stem base diametere0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“Allometric biomass models with stem base diameter as an independent variable were derived for individual tree components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage traits changed with tree size.

Taxon
Common Aspent0
Material
tree sizee0
Outcome
Foliage traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Foliage traits changed with both tree size and crown part.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage traits changed with crown part.

Taxon
Common Aspent0
Organ / stage
crown parte0
Outcome
Foliage traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Foliage traits changed with both tree size and crown part.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage contribution to total tree biomass declined with tree size.

Taxon
Common Aspent0
Material
tree sizee0
Outcome
foliage contribution to total tree biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass models showed that foliage contribution to total tree biomass decreased with tree size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total foliage area rose with tree size, reaching about 12 m2 at 120 mm tree diameter.

Taxon
Common Aspent0
Material
tree sizee0
Outcome
total foliage areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
about 12 m2e0
Qualifier
diameter of 120 mme0

Verbatim

e0

“The total foliage area of a tree increased with tree size, reaching its maximum value of about 12 m2 for a tree with a diameter of 120 mm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stand leaf area index increased with mean stand diameter to 13.5 m2 m−2.

Taxon
Common Aspent0
Material
mean stand diametere0
Outcome
Leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.5 m2 m−2e0

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index increased with mean stand diameter, reaching a maximum value of 13.5 m2 m−2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑