Paper · 2020 · Scientific Reports

Increased Prediction Accuracy Using Combined Genomic Information and Physiological Traits in A Soft Wheat Panel Evaluated in Multi-Environments

Jia Guo; Sumit Pradhan; Dipendra Shahi; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An integration of field-based phenotypic and genomic data can potentially increase the genetic gain in wheat breeding for complex traits such as grain and biomass yield. To validate this hypothesis in empirical field experiments, we compared the prediction accuracy between multi-kernel physiological and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) model to a single-kernel physiological or genomic BLUP model for grain yield (GY) using a soft wheat population that was evaluated in four environments. The physiological data including canopy temperature (CT), SPAD chlorophyll content (SPAD), membrane thermostability (MT), rate of senescence (RS), stay green trait (SGT), and NDVI values were collected at four environments (2016, 2017, and 2018 at Citra, FL; 2017 at Quincy, FL). Using a genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach, a total of 19,353 SNPs were generated and used to estimate prediction model accuracy. Prediction accuracies of grain yield evaluated in four environments improved when physiological traits and/or interaction effects (genotype × environment or physiology × environment) were included in the model compared to models with only genomic data. The proposed multi-kernel models that combined physiological and genomic data showed 35 to 169% increase in prediction accuracy compared to models with only genomic data included when heading date was used as a covariate. In general, higher response to selection was captured by the model combing effects of physiological and genotype × environment interaction compared to other models. The results of this study support the integration of field-based physiological data into GY prediction to improve genetic gain from selection in soft wheat under a multi-environment context.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The multi-kernel model combining physiological and genomic data increased grain yield prediction accuracy by 35 to 169% over genomic-only models.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Outcome
prediction accuracye1
Direction
increasee1
Value
35 to 169%e1
Qualifier
when heading date was used as a covariatee1
Comparator
models with only genomic datae1

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat Panel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The proposed multi-kernel models that combined physiological and genomic data showed 35 to 169% increase in prediction accuracy compared to models with only genomic data included when heading date was used as a covariate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1393 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model combining physiological and genotype × environment interaction effects captured a higher response to selection than other models.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Outcome
response to selectione2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other modelse2

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat Panel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher response to selection was captured by the model combing effects of physiological and genotype × environment interaction compared to other models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1558 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Including physiological traits and/or interaction effects improved grain yield prediction accuracies in four environments compared with genomic-only models.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Treatment
physiological traits and/or interaction effectse3
Outcome
Prediction accuracies of grain yielde3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
models with only genomic datae3
Setting
four environmentse3

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat Panel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Prediction accuracies of grain yield evaluated in four environments improved when physiological traits and/or interaction effects (genotype × environment or physiology × environment) were included in the model compared to models with only genomic data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1171 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The results support integrating field-based physiological data into grain yield prediction to improve genetic gain in soft wheat.

Taxon
soft wheate4
Outcome
integration of field-based physiological data into GY predictione4

Verbatim

t0

“Soft Wheat Panel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–111 · show in text ↑
e4

“The results of this study support the integration of field-based physiological data into GY prediction to improve genetic gain from selection in soft wheat under a multi-environment context”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1749 · show in text ↑