Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of shoot pruning intensity and sowing direction on growth and yield of Green gram (Vigna radiata L.) under bael (Aegle marmelos L.) based Agri-horti system in Vindhyan region

Priti Singh; Yashwant Singh; Kuldeep Chauhan; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Effect of shoot pruning intensity and sowing direction on growth and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.) under bael (Aegle marmelos L.) based Agri-horti system in Vindhyan region” was conducted during the Kharif season of 2015-2016 at Agricultural Research Farm, R.G.S.C. (BHU), Barakachha, Mirzapur (U. P.).The experiment was conducted in 9 year old bael orchard planted in 7x7 meter spacing. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with agri- horti system (fruit based Agroforestry system) i.e bael agri-horti system. Factorial experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design having four different intensity of pruning (i.e. control, 25%, 50% and 75%) and two different level of sowing direction (North-South and East-West). Treatments were replicated thrice. Results revealed that all the growth, yield attributes, yields were increased significantly with the increasing intensity of pruning 75% pruning significantly higher growth characters like plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g plant-1) trifoliate leaves, branches plant-1 and root nodules plant-1as well as yield and yield attributes like pods plant-1, number of grains pod-1, 1000-grains weight and yield of grain kg ha-1and stover with North South (NS) sowing direction. The maximum gross return, net return and benefit: cost ratio was obtained from the combined intensity of pruning 75% with NS sowing direction. Application of phosphorus at 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, to green gram was found optimum to realize the high yield and profit under stone apple based agri-horti system. The 75% pruning intensity with North South (NS) sowing direction under agro climatic conditions of Vindhyan region of Mirzapur was markedly enhanced the yield and net return of green gram as compared to control under bael based agri-horti system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth, yield attributes and yields of green gram increased significantly with increasing pruning intensity

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatae0
Treatment
increasing intensity of pruninge1
Outcome
growth, yield attributes, yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the growth, yield attributes, yields were increased significantly with the increasing intensity of pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–969 · show in text ↑
e2

“four different intensity of pruning (i.e. control, 25%, 50% and 75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% pruning gave higher growth characters of green gram than the control

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatae0
Treatment
75% pruninge4
Outcome
growth characters like plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g plant-1)e4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–143 · show in text ↑
e4

“75% pruning significantly higher growth characters like plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1080 · show in text ↑
e2

“four different intensity of pruning (i.e. control, 25%, 50% and 75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% pruning increased the yield attributes of green gram with North South sowing direction

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatae0
Treatment
increasing intensity of pruninge1
Outcome
pods plant-1, number of grains pod-1, 1000-grains weighte5
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
with North South (NS) sowing directione5
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the growth, yield attributes, yields were increased significantly with the increasing intensity of pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–969 · show in text ↑
e5

“yield and yield attributes like pods plant-1, number of grains pod-1, 1000-grains weight and yield of grain kg ha-1and stover with North South (NS) sowing direction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1316 · show in text ↑
e2

“four different intensity of pruning (i.e. control, 25%, 50% and 75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% pruning increased the grain yield and stover of green gram with North South sowing direction

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatae0
Treatment
increasing intensity of pruninge1
Outcome
yield of grain kg ha-1and stovere5
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
with North South (NS) sowing directione5
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the growth, yield attributes, yields were increased significantly with the increasing intensity of pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–969 · show in text ↑
e5

“yield and yield attributes like pods plant-1, number of grains pod-1, 1000-grains weight and yield of grain kg ha-1and stover with North South (NS) sowing direction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1316 · show in text ↑
e2

“four different intensity of pruning (i.e. control, 25%, 50% and 75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 75% pruning with North South sowing direction gave the maximum gross return, net return and benefit:cost ratio

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatae0
Treatment
combined intensity of pruning 75% with NS sowing directione6
Outcome
gross return, net return and benefit: cost ratioe6
Direction
maximume6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–143 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum gross return, net return and benefit: cost ratio was obtained from the combined intensity of pruning 75% with NS sowing direction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 was optimum for high yield and profit of green gram

Treatment
Application of phosphorus at 40 kg P2O5 ha-1e7
Outcome
high yield and profite7
Direction
optimume7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Application of phosphorus at 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, to green gram was found optimum to realize the high yield and profit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1575 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.