Paper · 2020 · Virus Research

Genotype by environment cultivar evaluation for cassava brown streak disease resistance in Tanzania

Rudolph R. Shirima; James P. Legg; Daniel G. Maeda; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cassava brown steak disease (CBSD), caused by Cassava brown streak virus (CBSV) and Ugandan cassava brown streak virus (UCBSV), is the most important biotic constraint to cassava production in East and Central Africa. Concerted efforts are required to prevent further spread into West Africa as well as to reduce losses in areas already affected. The study reported here was part of a five-country (Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania and Uganda) programme that aimed to identify superior cassava cultivars resistant to CBSD and to disseminate them widely in the region. Seventeen tissue-cultured and virus-tested cultivars were evaluated in Tanzania across nine sites with diverse CBSD inoculum conditions. Experiments were planted using an alpha-lattice design and assessments were made of surrounding inoculum pressure, CBSD foliar and root incidence and root yield at harvest. There were large differences in CBSD infection between sites, with greatest spread recorded from the north-western Lake (Victoria) zone. Differences were driven by Bemisia tabaci whitefly vector abundance and CBSD inoculum pressure. Both CBSV and UCBSV were almost equally represented in cassava fields surrounding experimental plots, although CBSV predominated in the north-west whilst UCBSV was more frequent in coastal and southern sites. However, the incidence of CBSV was much greater than that of UCBSV in initially virus-free experimental plots, suggesting that CBSV is more virulent. Cultivars could be categorised into three groups based on the degree of CBSD symptom expression in shoots and roots. The seven cultivars (F10_30R2, Eyope, Mkumba, Mkuranga1, Narocass1, Nase3 and Orera) in the most resistant category each had shoot and root incidences of less than 20%. Fresh root yield differed between sites and cultivars, but there was no genotype by environment interaction for this trait, probably attributable to the large fertility and soil moisture differences between sites. Susceptible cultivars and the local check performed well in the absence of CBSD pressure, highlighting the importance of exploiting quality and yield traits of local landraces in breeding programmes. Overall, our results emphasized the importance of applying a balanced strategy for CBSD management. This should use both improved and local germplasm resources to generate high yielding cultivars for specific end-user traits, and combine the deployment of improved cultivars with phytosanitary control measures including the use of healthy planting material and planting during periods of reduced CBSD infection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CBSD infection varied substantially between sites, with greatest spread in the north-western Lake zone.

Outcome
CBSD infectione0
Setting
north-western Lake (Victoria) zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were large differences in CBSD infection between sites, with greatest spread recorded from the north-western Lake (Victoria) zone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly abundance and inoculum pressure drove site differences.

Interactor
Bemisia tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
Differencese0
Qualifier
CBSD inoculum pressuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences were driven by Bemisia tabaci whitefly vector abundance and CBSD inoculum pressure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CBSV and UCBSV were nearly equally represented around plots, with differing regional predominance.

Outcome
CBSV and UCBSVe0
Setting
cassava fields surrounding experimental plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both CBSV and UCBSV were almost equally represented in cassava fields surrounding experimental plots, although CBSV predominated in the north-west whilst UCBSV was more frequent in coastal and southern sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1322 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CBSV incidence exceeded UCBSV incidence in initially virus-free plots.

Interactor
CBSVe0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of CBSVe0
Direction
much greatere0
Comparator
UCBSVe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the incidence of CBSV was much greater than that of UCBSV in initially virus-free experimental plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars formed three groups by shoot and root CBSD symptoms.

Outcome
three groupse0
Value
three groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars could be categorised into three groups based on the degree of CBSD symptom expression in shoots and roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven resistant cultivars each had shoot and root incidence below 20%.

Material
F10_30R2, Eyope, Mkumba, Mkuranga1, Narocass1, Nase3 and Orerae0
Outcome
shoot and root incidencese0
Value
less than 20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seven cultivars (F10_30R2, Eyope, Mkumba, Mkuranga1, Narocass1, Nase3 and Orera) in the most resistant category each had shoot and root incidences of less than 20%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh root yield differed among sites and cultivars.

Outcome
Fresh root yielde0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh root yield differed between sites and cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root yield showed no genotype by environment interaction.

Outcome
genotype by environment interactione0
Setting
environmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no genotype by environment interaction for this trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1881 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible cultivars and local check performed well without CBSD pressure.

Outcome
performed welle0
Qualifier
absence of CBSD pressuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Susceptible cultivars and the local check performed well in the absence of CBSD pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2061 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend improved and local germplasm plus phytosanitary measures for CBSD management.

Outcome
combine the deployment of improved cultivars with phytosanitary control measurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This should use both improved and local germplasm resources to generate high yielding cultivars for specific end-user traits, and combine the deployment of improved cultivars with phytosanitary control measures including the use of healthy planting material and planting during periods of reduced CBSD infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2273–2585 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑