Paper · 2020 · Palynology

Does season matter for moss surface sample collection? A case study from Kungur forest-steppe, pre-Urals, Russia

Lyudmila S. Shumilovskikh; Irina F. Abdulmanova; Elena G. Efimik

11
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Methodological papers advise to collect moss surface samples either at the beginning or at the end of the flowering season. In reality, such collections occur often within the flowering season for purposes of vegetation description or because of accessibility of remote study areas. Here we test whether the season of moss surface sample collection has an influence on pollen spectra. Ten moss/litter samples were collected in different habitats of the natural reserve ‘Spasskaya Gora’ (Perm region, Russia) in July and September from the same locations exactly. The results show that pollen assemblages reflect well the present dominant vegetation of Pinus-Betula-forests and grasslands and demonstrate differences between open and forested areas as well as between abandoned fodder meadows and semi-natural hay meadows in use. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon tests demonstrate that the dominant pollen taxa Pinus diploxylon-type, Betula and Poaceae as well as the rarefied number of pollen taxa do not differ significantly between seasons, while values of Artemisia are significantly higher in September. A significant decrease in pollen concentration in September indicates the importance of washing-out of pollen by precipitation. PCA results demonstrate the similarity of the pollen spectra between the seasons. Based on our results, we conclude that the season of surface sample collection does not significantly influence the pollen assemblages and appropriate field studies can be carried out in summer during the flowering season. However, we strongly recommend to collect bulk samples of mosses with basal parts and/or litter with surface soils in order to ensure representation of the average pollen signal for the previous years and to dilute local extremes in the pollen deposition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen assemblages reflected dominant Pinus-Betula forest and grassland vegetation.

Taxon
Pinus-Betulae0
Outcome
pollen assemblages reflect well the present dominant vegetatione0

Verbatim

e0

“pollen assemblages reflect well the present dominant vegetation of Pinus-Betula-forests and grasslands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–687 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen assemblages differed between open and forested areas.

Outcome
differences between open and forested arease0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“demonstrate differences between open and forested areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen assemblages differed between abandoned fodder and semi-natural hay meadows.

Outcome
between abandoned fodder meadows and semi-natural hay meadows in usee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“between abandoned fodder meadows and semi-natural hay meadows in use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–827 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant Pinus diploxylon-type, Betula and Poaceae pollen taxa did not differ significantly between seasons.

Taxon
Pinus diploxylon-typee0
Outcome
dominant pollen taxa Pinus diploxylon-type, Betula and Poaceaee0
Direction
do not differe0
Comparator
between seasonse0

Verbatim

e0

“the dominant pollen taxa Pinus diploxylon-type, Betula and Poaceae as well as the rarefied number of pollen taxa do not differ significantly between seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1036 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The rarefied number of pollen taxa did not differ significantly between seasons.

Outcome
rarefied number of pollen taxae0
Direction
do not differe0
Comparator
between seasonse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the rarefied number of pollen taxa do not differ significantly between seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1036 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Artemisia pollen values were significantly higher in September.

Taxon
ArtemisiaArtemisiae0
Outcome
values of Artemisiae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Artemisia
Artemisia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“values of Artemisia are significantly higher in September”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1101 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen concentration decreased significantly in September.

Outcome
pollen concentratione0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
Septembere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in pollen concentration in September”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1162 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA indicated similar pollen spectra between seasons.

Outcome
similarity of the pollen spectrae0
Comparator
between the seasonse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“PCA results demonstrate the similarity of the pollen spectra between the seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1311 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded collection season does not significantly influence pollen assemblages.

Outcome
pollen assemblagese0
Direction
does not significantly influencee0
Comparator
season of surface sample collectione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the season of surface sample collection does not significantly influence the pollen assemblages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1447 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Field studies can be carried out during the summer flowering season.

Taxon
mosst0
Outcome
field studies can be carried out in summer during the flowering seasone0

Verbatim

e0

“appropriate field studies can be carried out in summer during the flowering season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“moss surface sample collection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend bulk moss samples with basal parts and/or litter with surface soils.

Taxon
mossesBryophytae0
Outcome
collect bulk samples of mosses with basal parts and/or litter with surface soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“we strongly recommend to collect bulk samples of mosses with basal parts and/or litter with surface soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1650 · show in text ↑