Paper · 2020 · Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology

Validation of Screening Technique for Cotton Bacterial Blight Resistance under Controlled Condition

A. Sampath Kumar; K. Eraivan Arutkani Aiyanathan; S. Nakkeeran; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Seven different methods of artificial inoculation such as 1. Carborundum injury, 2. Pin prick injury 3. Sand paper injury, 4. Syringe inoculation on lower surface of leaf without needle, 5. Syringe inoculation of veins on lower surface of leaf with needle, 6. Tooth picks inoculation on collar region and 7. Pressurized spray inoculation were evaluated to find out the efficient and precise screening method for cotton bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas citri pv. malvacearum under controlled conditions (plant growth chamber). Inoculated seedlings were incubated at 28°C, 90% RH and 3000 LUX light intensity during day time and 22°C, 90% RH and absence of light during night time for symptom development. Among them, pin prick injury recorded maximum PDI (64.25) in 20-24 days post inoculation followed by sand paper injury (56.50 PDI) in 23-27 days post inoculation on 20 day old LRA 5166 cotton seedlings compared to other methods. Both these methods developed all types of symptoms. Initial symptom of water soaked lesion was appeared in 7-8 days post inoculation in pin prick injury while it was 9-10 days in sand paper injury.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pin prick injury produced the maximum bacterial blight PDI of 64.25 at 20–24 days after inoculation in LRA 5166 cotton seedlings.

Material
LRA 5166e0
Organ / stage
20 day olde0
Treatment
pin prick injurye0
Outcome
PDIe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
64.25e0
Qualifier
20-24 days post inoculatione0
Comparator
other methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Bacterial Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“pin prick injury recorded maximum PDI (64.25) in 20-24 days post inoculation followed by sand paper injury (56.50 PDI) in 23-27 days post inoculation on 20 day old LRA 5166 cotton seedlings compared to other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–937 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand paper injury produced a PDI of 56.50 at 23–27 days after inoculation, ranking after pin prick injury.

Material
LRA 5166e0
Organ / stage
20 day olde0
Treatment
sand paper injurye0
Outcome
PDIe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
56.50 PDIe0
Qualifier
23-27 days post inoculatione0
Comparator
other methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Bacterial Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“pin prick injury recorded maximum PDI (64.25) in 20-24 days post inoculation followed by sand paper injury (56.50 PDI) in 23-27 days post inoculation on 20 day old LRA 5166 cotton seedlings compared to other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–937 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pin prick and sand paper injury methods each developed all types of bacterial blight symptoms.

Outcome
all types of symptomse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Bacterial Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both these methods developed all types of symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–990 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial water soaked lesions appeared 7–8 days after pin prick inoculation.

Treatment
pin prick injurye0
Outcome
water soaked lesione0
Value
7-8 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Bacterial Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Initial symptom of water soaked lesion was appeared in 7-8 days post inoculation in pin prick injury while it was 9-10 days in sand paper injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1136 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial water soaked lesions appeared 9–10 days after sand paper inoculation.

Treatment
sand paper injurye0
Outcome
water soaked lesione0
Value
9-10 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Bacterial Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Initial symptom of water soaked lesion was appeared in 7-8 days post inoculation in pin prick injury while it was 9-10 days in sand paper injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1136 · show in text ↑