Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Evaluation of Selection Methods for Resistance to a Specialist Insect Pest of Squash (Cucurbita pepo)

Lauren J. Brzozowski; Michael Mazourek

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant varieties resistant to insect pests are a critical component of integrated pest management, but challenges associated with plant breeding for insect resistance, such as a long breeding cycle duration and low trait heritability, slow progress in the field. In this study, we tested two novel selection schemes to improve genetic gain for resistance to the major pest, the striped cucumber beetle (Acalymma vittatum), in squash (Cucurbita pepo, e.g., zucchini). First, we tested an indirect selection scheme using a proxy insect with correlated resistance phenotypes, Trichoplusia ni, in place of the seasonally available A. vittatum. We found that while resistance to herbivory by T. ni was heritable, there was no reciprocal benefit for resistance to A. vittatum. Second, we tested genomic selection, a method that allows for selection without phenotyping every generation, for both resistance to A. vittatum directly and resistance to the proxy T. ni. Although there was moderate genomic predictive ability, we did not observe realized gains from selection in field trials. Overall, strategies that minimize investment in direct phenotyping, leverage efficiencies from phenotyping correlated traits, and shorten breeding cycle duration are needed to develop insect resistant varieties, and this study provides examples and empirical data of two such approaches deployed in an applied breeding program.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance to Trichoplusia ni herbivory was heritable.

Taxon
squasht0
Interactor
T. nie0herbivore
Outcome
resistance to herbivory by T. nie0

Verbatim

e0

“resistance to herbivory by T. ni was heritable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proxy selection conferred no reciprocal benefit for A. vittatum resistance.

Taxon
squasht0
Interactor
A. vittatumAcalymma vittatume0pest
Outcome
no reciprocal benefit for resistance to A. vittatume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acalymma vittatum
Acalymma vittatum · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no reciprocal benefit for resistance to A. vittatum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genomic selection had moderate predictive ability.

Taxon
squasht0
Outcome
moderate genomic predictive abilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was moderate genomic predictive ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genomic selection produced no realized gains in field trials.

Taxon
squasht0
Outcome
realized gains from selectione0
Setting
field trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“we did not observe realized gains from selection in field trials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend shorter breeding cycles and efficient correlated trait phenotyping.

Taxon
squasht0
Outcome
strategies that minimize investment in direct phenotyping, leverage efficiencies from phenotyping correlated traits, and shorten breeding cycle duratione0

Verbatim

e0

“strategies that minimize investment in direct phenotyping, leverage efficiencies from phenotyping correlated traits, and shorten breeding cycle duration are needed to develop insect resistant varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑