Paper · 2015 · Misr journal of agricultural engineering

EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL TRANSPLANTING TECHNIQUE ON PRODUCTIVITY FOR G86 COTTON VARIETY

M. A. Hassan; M. A. Basiouny; A. E. El-Yamani

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experimental study was carried out to evaluate the performance of mechanical transplanting technique using cotton variety G86. The transplanting experiments were conducted using a Holland type transplanter to evaluate the effect of four forward speeds (1.43, 1.77, 2.05 and 2.44km/h), three hill spacing (0.15, 0.2 and 0.25m) and four planting depths (5, 7, 10 and 12cm) compared with manual transplanting. Both mechanical and manual transplanting methods were undertaken at the same time. Effective field capacity, field efficiency, seedling miss index, seedlings multiples index, quality of feed index, amount of seedling rate and plant yield traits (h. first fruit, seed cotton yield/fed, lint cotton yield/fed, boll weight, lint percent and seed index) were determined. Results illustrated that increasing planting forward speed increased actual field capacity, affective field efficiency, seedling miss index, the quality of feed index and criterion function cost. While, seedling multiple index, total productivity and losses in productivity were decreased. Also results indicated that, maximum of effective field capacity; field efficiency and productivity were 0.711fed/h, 80.1% and 7.61kantar/fed, respectively. While minimum of seedling miss index, seedling multiple index and quality of feed index were 1.7%, 1.3% and 89.9% respectively. The optimum operational conditions of machine transplanting were at forward speed 1.77km/h, hill spacing of 0.15m and planting depth of 7cm at this condition total productivity was 7.41kentar/fed and total losses in productivity was 0.226kentar/fed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting forward speed increased actual field capacity, field efficiency and seedling miss index in mechanical cotton transplanting.

Material
G86e5
Treatment
increasing planting forward speede1
Outcome
actual field capacity, affective field efficiency, seedling miss indexe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results illustrated that increasing planting forward speed increased actual field capacity, affective field efficiency, seedling miss index, the quality of feed index and criterion function cost. While, seedling multiple index, total productivity and losses in productivity were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1062 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting forward speed increased the quality of feed index and criterion function cost in mechanical cotton transplanting.

Material
G86e5
Treatment
increasing planting forward speede1
Outcome
the quality of feed index and criterion function coste1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results illustrated that increasing planting forward speed increased actual field capacity, affective field efficiency, seedling miss index, the quality of feed index and criterion function cost. While, seedling multiple index, total productivity and losses in productivity were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1062 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting forward speed decreased seedling multiple index, total productivity and losses in productivity.

Material
G86e5
Treatment
increasing planting forward speede1
Outcome
seedling multiple index, total productivity and losses in productivitye1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results illustrated that increasing planting forward speed increased actual field capacity, affective field efficiency, seedling miss index, the quality of feed index and criterion function cost. While, seedling multiple index, total productivity and losses in productivity were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1062 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum effective field capacity of the cotton transplanter was 0.711 fed/h.

Outcome
effective field capacitye2
Value
0.711fed/he2
Qualifier
maximume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Also results indicated that, maximum of effective field capacity; field efficiency and productivity were 0.711fed/h, 80.1% and 7.61kantar/fed, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1219 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum field efficiency of the cotton transplanter was 80.1%.

Outcome
field efficiencye2
Value
80.1%e2
Qualifier
maximume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Also results indicated that, maximum of effective field capacity; field efficiency and productivity were 0.711fed/h, 80.1% and 7.61kantar/fed, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1219 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum productivity of the cotton transplanter was 7.61 kantar/fed.

Outcome
productivitye2
Value
7.61kantar/fede2
Qualifier
maximume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Also results indicated that, maximum of effective field capacity; field efficiency and productivity were 0.711fed/h, 80.1% and 7.61kantar/fed, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1219 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum seedling miss index of the cotton transplanter was 1.7%.

Outcome
seedling miss indexe3
Value
1.7%e3
Qualifier
minimume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“While minimum of seedling miss index, seedling multiple index and quality of feed index were 1.7%, 1.3% and 89.9% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1347 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum seedling multiple index of the cotton transplanter was 1.3%.

Outcome
seedling multiple indexe3
Value
1.3%e3
Qualifier
minimume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“While minimum of seedling miss index, seedling multiple index and quality of feed index were 1.7%, 1.3% and 89.9% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1347 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum quality of feed index of the cotton transplanter was 89.9%.

Outcome
quality of feed indexe3
Value
89.9%e3
Qualifier
minimume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“While minimum of seedling miss index, seedling multiple index and quality of feed index were 1.7%, 1.3% and 89.9% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1347 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum machine transplanting conditions were forward speed 1.77 km/h, hill spacing 0.15 m and planting depth 7 cm.

Outcome
optimum operational conditions of machine transplantinge4
Qualifier
forward speed 1.77km/h, hill spacing of 0.15m and planting depth of 7cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The optimum operational conditions of machine transplanting were at forward speed 1.77km/h, hill spacing of 0.15m and planting depth of 7cm at this condition total productivity was 7.41kentar/fed and total losses in productivity was 0.226kentar/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1597 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the optimum conditions, total productivity was 7.41 kentar/fed.

Outcome
total productivitye4
Value
7.41kentar/fede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The optimum operational conditions of machine transplanting were at forward speed 1.77km/h, hill spacing of 0.15m and planting depth of 7cm at this condition total productivity was 7.41kentar/fed and total losses in productivity was 0.226kentar/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1597 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the optimum conditions, total losses in productivity were 0.226 kentar/fed.

Outcome
total losses in productivitye4
Value
0.226kentar/fede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The optimum operational conditions of machine transplanting were at forward speed 1.77km/h, hill spacing of 0.15m and planting depth of 7cm at this condition total productivity was 7.41kentar/fed and total losses in productivity was 0.226kentar/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1597 · show in text ↑
e5

“cotton variety G86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑