Abstract
The experiments were carried out during 2014 seasons at Sakha-farm research to evaluate performance of modification transplanter for cotton seedling. The experiments were conducted using a modification transplanter to evaluate the effect of forward speed of 1.88, 2.35, 2.95 and 3.38 km/h, hill spacing of 0.15, 0.2, 0.25 and 0.3 m and planting depth of 8, 10, 12, 15 cm. the present work was used to study the effect of previous variables on effective field capacity, field efficiency, longitudinal and transverse seed scattering, ground wheel slip, germination ratio, seedling miss index, the seedlings multiples index, the quality of feed index, the amount of seedling rate and crop yield. Also, determination of specific fuel consumption, operating and criterion function cost of cotton transplanting were done. Results illustrated that by increasing planting forward speed actual field capacity, affective field efficiency, both of longitudinal and transverse scattering, slip ratio, seedling miss index, the quality of feed index and criterion function cost were increased. While, seedling multiple index, specific fuel consumption, productivity and total operation cost were decreased. Maximum of effective field capacity, field efficiency, productivity, specific fuel consumption and the quality of feed index were 0.739 fed/h, 83.1%,7.61 kantar/fed, 0.731 L/kW.h and 92.3% respectively. While, minimum of longitudinal scattering, transverse scattering, slip ratio, seedling miss index was and seedling multiple index were 0.016 m, 0.010 m, 7.42%, 2.1% and 4.0% respectively. The optimum operation condition of machine transplanting was obtained at forward speed of 2.95 km/h, hill spacing of 0.25 m and planting depth of 8 cm.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing forward speed increased effective field capacity, efficiency, scattering, slip, miss index, feed index and cost.
- Treatment
- planting forward speede0
- Outcome
- actual field capacity, affective field efficiency, both of longitudinal and transverse scatteringe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue
Verbatim
e0“by increasing planting forward speed actual field capacity, affective field efficiency, both of longitudinal and transverse scattering, slip ratio, seedling miss index, the quality of feed index and criterion function cost were increased.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing forward speed decreased multiple index, fuel consumption, productivity and operation cost.
- Outcome
- seedling multiple index, specific fuel consumption, productivity and total operation coste0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue
Verbatim
e0“seedling multiple index, specific fuel consumption, productivity and total operation cost were decreased.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum effective field capacity was 0.739 fed/h.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Maximum of effective field capacity, field efficiency, productivity, specific fuel consumption and the quality of feed index were 0.739 fed/h, 83.1%,7.61 kantar/fed, 0.731 L/kW.h and 92.3% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum field efficiency was 83.1%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Maximum of effective field capacity, field efficiency, productivity, specific fuel consumption and the quality of feed index were 0.739 fed/h, 83.1%,7.61 kantar/fed, 0.731 L/kW.h and 92.3% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum productivity was 7.61 kantar/fed.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Maximum of effective field capacity, field efficiency, productivity, specific fuel consumption and the quality of feed index were 0.739 fed/h, 83.1%,7.61 kantar/fed, 0.731 L/kW.h and 92.3% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum specific fuel consumption was 0.731 L/kW.h.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Maximum of effective field capacity, field efficiency, productivity, specific fuel consumption and the quality of feed index were 0.739 fed/h, 83.1%,7.61 kantar/fed, 0.731 L/kW.h and 92.3% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum feed quality index was 92.3%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Maximum of effective field capacity, field efficiency, productivity, specific fuel consumption and the quality of feed index were 0.739 fed/h, 83.1%,7.61 kantar/fed, 0.731 L/kW.h and 92.3% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum longitudinal scattering was 0.016 m.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“minimum of longitudinal scattering, transverse scattering, slip ratio, seedling miss index was and seedling multiple index were 0.016 m, 0.010 m, 7.42%, 2.1% and 4.0% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum transverse scattering was 0.010 m.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“minimum of longitudinal scattering, transverse scattering, slip ratio, seedling miss index was and seedling multiple index were 0.016 m, 0.010 m, 7.42%, 2.1% and 4.0% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum slip ratio was 7.42%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“minimum of longitudinal scattering, transverse scattering, slip ratio, seedling miss index was and seedling multiple index were 0.016 m, 0.010 m, 7.42%, 2.1% and 4.0% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum seedling miss index was 2.1%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“minimum of longitudinal scattering, transverse scattering, slip ratio, seedling miss index was and seedling multiple index were 0.016 m, 0.010 m, 7.42%, 2.1% and 4.0% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum seedling multiple index was 4.0%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“minimum of longitudinal scattering, transverse scattering, slip ratio, seedling miss index was and seedling multiple index were 0.016 m, 0.010 m, 7.42%, 2.1% and 4.0% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Optimal machine transplanting used 2.95 km/h forward speed, 0.25 m spacing and 8 cm depth.
- Treatment
- forward speed of 2.95 km/h, hill spacing of 0.25 m and planting depth of 8 cme0
- Outcome
- optimum operation condition of machine transplantinge0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The optimum operation condition of machine transplanting was obtained at forward speed of 2.95 km/h, hill spacing of 0.25 m and planting depth of 8 cm.”