Paper · 2020 · Phytopathology

Parastagonospora nodorum and Related Species in Western Canada: Genetic Variability and Effector Genes

Mohamed Hafez; Ryan Gourlie; Therese Despins; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Parastagonospora nodorum is an important fungal pathogen that causes Septoria nodorum blotch (SNB) in wheat. This pathogen produces several necrotrophic effectors that act as virulence factors; three have been cloned, SnToxA, SnTox1, and SnTox3. In this study, P. nodorum and its sister species P. avenaria f. tritici (Pat1) were isolated from wheat node and grain samples collected from distanced sites in western Canada during 2018. The presence of effector genes and associated haplotypes were determined by PCR and sequence analysis. An internal transcribed spacer-restriction fragment length polymorphism test was developed to distinguish between leaf spotting pathogens (P. nodorum, Pat1, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, and Bipolaris sorokiniana). P. nodorum was mainly recovered from wheat nodes and to a lesser extent from the grains, while Pat1 was exclusively isolated from grain samples. The effector genes were present in almost all P. nodorum isolates, with the ToxA haplotype 5 (H5) being most prevalent, while a novel ToxA haplotype (denoted here H21) is reported for the first time. In Pat1, only combinations of SnTox1 and SnTox3 genes were present. A ToxA haplotype network was also constructed to assess the evolutionary relationship among globally found haplotypes to date. Finally, cultivars representing wheat development in Canada for the last century were tested for sensitivity to Sn-effectors and to the presence of Tsn1, the ToxA sensitivity gene. Of tested cultivars, 32.9 and 56.9% were sensitive to SnTox1 and SnTox3, respectively, and Tsn1 was present in 59% of the cultivars. In conclusion, P. nodorum and Pat1 were prevalent wheat pathogens in Canada with a potential tissue-specific colonization capacity, while producing necrotrophic effectors to which wheat is sensitive.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. nodorum was recovered mainly from wheat nodes and less from grain.

Organ / stage
wheat nodese0
Outcome
recovered from wheat nodese0
Direction
mainlye0
Qualifier
to a lesser extent from the grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · TaxonM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. nodorum was mainly recovered from wheat nodes and to a lesser extent from the grains, while Pat1 was exclusively isolated from grain samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pat1 was isolated exclusively from wheat grain samples.

Taxon
Pat1e0
Organ / stage
grain samplese0
Outcome
isolated from grain samplese0
Qualifier
exclusivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“P. nodorum was mainly recovered from wheat nodes and to a lesser extent from the grains, while Pat1 was exclusively isolated from grain samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effector genes occurred in almost all P. nodorum isolates.

Outcome
effector genes were presente0
Qualifier
almost all P. nodorum isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · TaxonM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effector genes were present in almost all P. nodorum isolates, with the ToxA haplotype 5 (H5) being most prevalent, while a novel ToxA haplotype (denoted here H21) is reported for the first time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1097 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ToxA haplotype 5 was most prevalent.

Gene
ToxAe0
Outcome
haplotype 5 (H5) being most prevalente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · TaxonM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effector genes were present in almost all P. nodorum isolates, with the ToxA haplotype 5 (H5) being most prevalent, while a novel ToxA haplotype (denoted here H21) is reported for the first time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1097 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A novel ToxA H21 haplotype was reported.

Gene
ToxAe0
Outcome
novel ToxA haplotype (denoted here H21)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · TaxonM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effector genes were present in almost all P. nodorum isolates, with the ToxA haplotype 5 (H5) being most prevalent, while a novel ToxA haplotype (denoted here H21) is reported for the first time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1097 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pat1 carried only combinations of SnTox1 and SnTox3.

Taxon
Pat1e0
Gene
SnTox1 and SnTox3e0
Outcome
only combinations of SnTox1 and SnTox3 genes were presente0

Verbatim

e0

“In Pat1, only combinations of SnTox1 and SnTox3 genes were present.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

32.9 of tested wheat cultivars were sensitive to SnTox1.

Material
cultivarse0
Gene
SnTox1e0
Outcome
sensitive to SnTox1e0
Value
32.9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of tested cultivars, 32.9 and 56.9% were sensitive to SnTox1 and SnTox3, respectively, and Tsn1 was present in 59% of the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1606 · show in text ↑
e7

“cultivars representing wheat development in Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1352 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

56.9% of tested wheat cultivars were sensitive to SnTox3.

Material
cultivarse0
Gene
SnTox3e0
Outcome
sensitive to SnTox1 and SnTox3e0
Value
56.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of tested cultivars, 32.9 and 56.9% were sensitive to SnTox1 and SnTox3, respectively, and Tsn1 was present in 59% of the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1606 · show in text ↑
e7

“cultivars representing wheat development in Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1352 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tsn1 was present in 59% of tested cultivars.

Material
cultivarse0
Gene
Tsn1e0
Outcome
Tsn1 was presente0
Value
59%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of tested cultivars, 32.9 and 56.9% were sensitive to SnTox1 and SnTox3, respectively, and Tsn1 was present in 59% of the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1606 · show in text ↑
e7

“cultivars representing wheat development in Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1352 · show in text ↑