Abstract
A field experiment was undertaken at the Experimental Farm, Department of Horticulture, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat during 2003-2004. The experiment was set in Randomized Block Design (RBD) consisting of three replications and eight treatments. The treatments comprised of T1: £500 g, T2: >500-1000 g, T3: >1000-1500 g, T4: >1500-2000 g, T5: >2000-2500 g, T6: >2500-3000 g, T7: >3000-3500 g and T8:>3500-4000 g.The results revealed that the growth parameters and yield attributes were significantly influenced by the treatments. Among them, T4 showed superiority in case of pseudostem height (278.68 cm), least phyllochron (7.76), and also shortened the planting shooting interval (181.05 days), shooting-harvest interval (97.15 days) and crop duration (278.27 days). However, T5 was observed to be the most effective for enhancement of maximum pseudostem girth (68.30 cm), total leaf production (22.99), number of functional leaves (6.97) and leaf area index (3.17).Regarding the yield and yield attributing characters, the superiority of T4 could be noticed in respect of number of hands per bunch (8.01), length of finger (24.06 cm), girth of finger (11.97 cm), volume of finger (209.36 cc), weight of finger (149.97 g) and harvest index (0.38). However, the treatment T5 exhibited the highest yield (62.71 t/ha), bunch weight (20.36 kg), number of fingers per hand (15.70).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments significantly influenced growth parameters and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- Bananat0
- Material
- Barjahaji (AAA)t0
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- growth parameters and yield attributese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“the growth parameters and yield attributes were significantly influenced by the treatments”
t0“Banana (Musa spp.) cv. Barjahaji (AAA)”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 was superior for pseudostem height, at 278.68 cm.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T4 showed superiority in case of pseudostem height (278.68 cm)”
t0“Banana (Musa spp.) cv. Barjahaji (AAA)”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 had the least phyllochron, 7.76.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T4 showed superiority in case of pseudostem height (278.68 cm), least phyllochron (7.76)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 shortened the planting shooting interval to 181.05 days.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T4 showed superiority in case of pseudostem height (278.68 cm), least phyllochron (7.76), and also shortened the planting shooting interval (181.05 days)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 shortened the shooting-harvest interval to 97.15 days.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T4 showed superiority in case of pseudostem height (278.68 cm), least phyllochron (7.76), and also shortened the planting shooting interval (181.05 days), shooting-harvest interval (97.15 days)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 shortened crop duration to 278.27 days.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T4 showed superiority in case of pseudostem height (278.68 cm), least phyllochron (7.76), and also shortened the planting shooting interval (181.05 days), shooting-harvest interval (97.15 days) and crop duration (278.27 days)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave maximum pseudostem girth of 68.30 cm.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T5 was observed to be the most effective for enhancement of maximum pseudostem girth (68.30 cm)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 was most effective for total leaf production, 22.99.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T5 was observed to be the most effective for enhancement of maximum pseudostem girth (68.30 cm), total leaf production (22.99)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 was most effective for functional leaf number, 6.97.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T5 was observed to be the most effective for enhancement of maximum pseudostem girth (68.30 cm), total leaf production (22.99), number of functional leaves (6.97)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 was most effective for leaf area index, 3.17.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“T5 was observed to be the most effective for enhancement of maximum pseudostem girth (68.30 cm), total leaf production (22.99), number of functional leaves (6.97) and leaf area index (3.17)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 was superior for hands per bunch, 8.01.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the superiority of T4 could be noticed in respect of number of hands per bunch (8.01)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 was superior for finger length, 24.06 cm.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the superiority of T4 could be noticed in respect of number of hands per bunch (8.01), length of finger (24.06 cm)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 was superior for finger girth, 11.97 cm.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the superiority of T4 could be noticed in respect of number of hands per bunch (8.01), length of finger (24.06 cm), girth of finger (11.97 cm)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 was superior for finger volume, 209.36 cc.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the superiority of T4 could be noticed in respect of number of hands per bunch (8.01), length of finger (24.06 cm), girth of finger (11.97 cm), volume of finger (209.36 cc)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 was superior for finger weight, 149.97 g.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the superiority of T4 could be noticed in respect of number of hands per bunch (8.01), length of finger (24.06 cm), girth of finger (11.97 cm), volume of finger (209.36 cc), weight of finger (149.97 g)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 was superior for harvest index, 0.38.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the superiority of T4 could be noticed in respect of number of hands per bunch (8.01), length of finger (24.06 cm), girth of finger (11.97 cm), volume of finger (209.36 cc), weight of finger (149.97 g) and harvest index (0.38)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had the highest yield, 62.71 t/ha.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the treatment T5 exhibited the highest yield (62.71 t/ha)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had the highest bunch weight, 20.36 kg.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the treatment T5 exhibited the highest yield (62.71 t/ha), bunch weight (20.36 kg)”
t0“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had the highest fingers per hand, 15.70.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the treatment T5 exhibited the highest yield (62.71 t/ha), bunch weight (20.36 kg), number of fingers per hand (15.70)”
t0“Banana”