Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during kharif, 2019 at different experimental farms (Anand, Sansoli and Godhra) of Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat to evaluate the efficacy of different insecticides against fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) infesting maize. Spinetoram 11.7 SC, 0.117 %, emamectin benzoate 5 SG, 0.0025 %, chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC, 0.006 % and thiodicarb 75 WP, 0.11 % were found more effective in checking the larval population, plant and cob damage in maize which also reflected on grain and fodder yield as well.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Spinetoram, emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole and thiodicarb were more effective in checking the fall armyworm larval population and plant and cob damage in maize
- Treatment
- Spinetoram 11.7 SC, 0.117 %, emamectin benzoate 5 SG, 0.0025 %, chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC, 0.006 % and thiodicarb 75 WP, 0.11 %e2
- Interactor
- fall armyworm
.jpg?width=60)
Spodoptera frugiperdae1pest - Outcome
- larval population, plant and cob damagee2
- Direction
- more effectivee2
- Setting
- Anand, Sansoli and Godhrae1
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was carried out during kharif, 2019 at different experimental farms (Anand, Sansoli and Godhra) of Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat to evaluate the efficacy of different insecticides against fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) infesting maize”
e2“Spinetoram 11.7 SC, 0.117 %, emamectin benzoate 5 SG, 0.0025 %, chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC, 0.006 % and thiodicarb 75 WP, 0.11 % were found more effective in checking the larval population, plant and cob damage in maize which also reflected on grain and fodder yield as well”
Claim · model-written summary
The same insecticide treatments also raised grain and fodder yield of maize
- Treatment
- Spinetoram 11.7 SC, 0.117 %, emamectin benzoate 5 SG, 0.0025 %, chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC, 0.006 % and thiodicarb 75 WP, 0.11 %e2
- Interactor
- fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
- Outcome
- grain and fodder yielde2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Setting
- Anand, Sansoli and Godhrae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was carried out during kharif, 2019 at different experimental farms (Anand, Sansoli and Godhra) of Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat to evaluate the efficacy of different insecticides against fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) infesting maize”
e2“Spinetoram 11.7 SC, 0.117 %, emamectin benzoate 5 SG, 0.0025 %, chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC, 0.006 % and thiodicarb 75 WP, 0.11 % were found more effective in checking the larval population, plant and cob damage in maize which also reflected on grain and fodder yield as well”
The same questions in other papers
emamectin benzoate · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →chlorantraniliprole · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →thiodicarb · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Spinetoram · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
27 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.