Paper · 2020 · Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

A Two-Stage Method for Improving the Prediction Accuracy of Complex Traits by Incorporating Genotype by Environment Interactions inBrassica napus

Sican Xiong; Meng Wang; Jun Zou; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Improving the prediction accuracy of a complex trait of interest is key to performing genomic selection (GS) for crop breeding. For the complex trait measured in multiple environments, this paper proposes a two-stage method to solve a linear model that jointly models the genetic effects and the genotype × environment interaction ( G × E ) effects. In the first stage, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalized method was utilized to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL). Then, the ordinary least squares (OLS) approach was used in the second stage to reestimate the QTL effects. As a case study, this approach was used to improve the prediction accuracies of flowering time (FT), oil content (OC), and seed yield per plant (SY) in Brassica napus ( B. napus ). The results showed that the G × E effects reduced the mean squared error (MSE) significantly. Numerous QTL were environment-specific and presented minor effects. On average, the two-stage method, named OLS post-LASSO, offers the highest prediction accuracies (correlations are 0.8789, 0.9045, and 0.5507 for FT, OC, and SY, respectively). It was followed by the marker × environment interaction ( M × E ) genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model (correlations are 0.8347, 0.8205, and 0.4005 for FT, OC, and SY, respectively), the LASSO method (correlations are 0.7583, 0.7755, and 0.2718 for FT, OC, and SY, respectively), and the stratified GBLUP model (correlations are 0.6789, 0.6361, and 0.2860 for FT, OC, and SY, respectively). The two-stage method showed an obvious improvement in the prediction accuracy, and this study will provide methods and reference to improve GS of breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by environment effects significantly reduced prediction mean squared error.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
mean squared error (MSE)e1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
G × E effectse1

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Brassica napus ( B. napus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“the G × E effects reduced the mean squared error (MSE) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–884 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Numerous QTL were environment specific and had minor effects.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Gene
QTLe1
Outcome
environment-specific and presented minor effectse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Brassica napus ( B. napus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“Numerous QTL were environment-specific and presented minor effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–952 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OLS post-LASSO attained a flowering time prediction correlation of 0.8789, the highest among tested models.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Treatment
OLS post-LASSOe1
Outcome
prediction accuraciese1
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.8789e1
Qualifier
FTe1

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Brassica napus ( B. napus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two-stage method, named OLS post-LASSO, offers the highest prediction accuracies (correlations are 0.8789, 0.9045, and 0.5507 for FT, OC, and SY, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1129 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OLS post-LASSO attained an oil content prediction correlation of 0.9045, the highest among tested models.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Treatment
OLS post-LASSOe1
Outcome
prediction accuraciese1
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.9045e1
Qualifier
OCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Brassica napus ( B. napus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two-stage method, named OLS post-LASSO, offers the highest prediction accuracies (correlations are 0.8789, 0.9045, and 0.5507 for FT, OC, and SY, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1129 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OLS post-LASSO attained a seed yield prediction correlation of 0.5507, the highest among tested models.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Treatment
OLS post-LASSOe1
Outcome
prediction accuraciese1
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.5507e1
Qualifier
SYe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Brassica napus ( B. napus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two-stage method, named OLS post-LASSO, offers the highest prediction accuracies (correlations are 0.8789, 0.9045, and 0.5507 for FT, OC, and SY, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1129 · show in text ↑