Paper · 2020 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Effect of Planting Distances and Weed Control Treatments on Faba Bean Yield and Associated Weeds

El-Saeed El-Gedwy

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out in the Farm of Agricultural Research and Experimental Center of Agriculture Faculty at Moshtohor, Benha University, Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt, during 2017/18 and 2018/19 seasons. The study were investigated the effect of three planting distances, i.e. 20, 25 and 30 cm between hills with six weed control treatments, i.e. acetochlor at rate of 840 g active ingredient (a.i)/fed (Harness 84 % EC), pendimethalin at rate of 773.5 g a.i/fed (Stomp extra 45.5 % CS), metribuzin at rate of 210 g a.i/fed (Sencor 70 % WP), bentazon at rate of 240 g a.i/fed (Basagran 48 % AS) + clethodium at rate of 62.5 g a.i/fed (Select super 12.5 % EC), hand hoeing twice and the unweeded check on growth, seed yield/fed and its yield components of faba bean cv. Giza 843 as well as associated weeds. Faba bean planted at narrow planting distance (20 cm between hills) gave the lowest values of weed biomass compared with the other two planting distances (25 and 30 cm between hills) at 70 days after sowing as well as produced the greatest values of leaf area index, plant height and seed yield/fed during the both seasons. While, the highest values of No. of branches, No. of pods, No. of seeds and seed weight/plant as well as 100-seed weight were obtained from planting faba bean at wide planting distance (30 cm between hills) in the both seasons. The main findings show that experimental field was infested by annual weeds for the unweeded check by 659.9 and 1041.8 kg dry weight of weeds/fed, exhibited seed yield loss of 74.82 and 79.65 % faba bean yield/fed compared with the best treatment (hand hoeing twice) in 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons, respectively, planting faba bean under hand hoeing twice or using bentazon + clethodium surpassed the other weed control treatments in depressing weed biomass at 70 days after faba bean sowing. On the other hand, the two treatments gave the greatest values of all faba bean traits without significant difference between them. The highest depression in weed biomass and the maximum values of plant height and seed yield/fed were recorded from planting faba bean at 20 cm between hills and weed control by hand hoeing twice or using bentazon + clethodium. While, the greatest values of No. of pods/plant, No. of seeds/plant and seed weight/plant in both seasons which obtained from planting faba bean at wide planting distance (30 cm between hills) under weed control by hand hoeing twice or using bentazon + clethodium. Analyzing the faba bean seeds found that there was no residual detected of herbicides used. The economic analysis indicate that planting faba bean at 20 cm between hills and weed control by hand hoeing twice gave the net benefit valued 10435 and 8465 L.E./fed in the first and second seasons, respectively without herbicides residues. It could be summarized that planting faba bean cv. Giza 843 at planting distance 20 cm between hills with using hand hoeing twice or chemical control by bentazon + clethodium depression weed biomass and maximized seed yield/fed accompanied with the highest values of gross income, net benefit and benefit/cost and without herbicides residues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 cm spacing, weed biomass was lowest and faba bean leaf area index, height and yield were greatest.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
20 cm between hillse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
25 and 30 cm between hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Faba bean planted at narrow planting distance (20 cm between hills) gave the lowest values of weed biomass compared with the other two planting distances (25 and 30 cm between hills) at 70 days after sowing as well as produced the greatest values of leaf area index, plant height and seed yield/fed during the both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 cm spacing, branch, pod and seed counts, seed weight per plant and 100-seed weight were highest.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
30 cm between hillse0
Outcome
No. of branches, No. of pods, No. of seedse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values of No. of branches, No. of pods, No. of seeds and seed weight/plant as well as 100-seed weight were obtained from planting faba bean at wide planting distance (30 cm between hills) in the both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unweeded plots lost 74.82% yield in 2017/18 against twice-hoed plots.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Outcome
seed yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
74.82e0
Qualifier
2017/2018e0
Comparator
hand hoeing twicee0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exhibited seed yield loss of 74.82 and 79.65 % faba bean yield/fed compared with the best treatment (hand hoeing twice) in 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unweeded plots lost 79.65% yield in 2018/19 against twice-hoed plots.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Outcome
seed yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
79.65 %e0
Qualifier
2018/2019e0
Comparator
hand hoeing twicee0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exhibited seed yield loss of 74.82 and 79.65 % faba bean yield/fed compared with the best treatment (hand hoeing twice) in 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hoeing or bentazon plus clethodium suppressed weed biomass more than other controls.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
hand hoeing twice or using bentazon + clethodiume0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
depressinge0
Comparator
other weed control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand hoeing twice or using bentazon + clethodium surpassed the other weed control treatments in depressing weed biomass at 70 days after faba bean sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hoeing or bentazon plus clethodium produced greatest faba bean traits without significant difference between them.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
two treatmentse0
Outcome
all faba bean traitse0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
between theme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two treatments gave the greatest values of all faba bean traits without significant difference between them.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1891–2003 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No herbicide residues were detected in faba bean seeds.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Outcome
residuale0
Direction
no residual detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analyzing the faba bean seeds found that there was no residual detected of herbicides used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2497–2588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-centimeter spacing with twice hoeing yielded net benefits of 10435 L.E./fed in the first season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
20 cm between hills and weed control by hand hoeing twicee0
Outcome
net benefite0
Value
10435e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting faba bean at 20 cm between hills and weed control by hand hoeing twice gave the net benefit valued 10435 and 8465 L.E./fed in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2625–2802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-centimeter spacing with twice hoeing yielded net benefits of 8465 L.E./fed in the second season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
20 cm between hills and weed control by hand hoeing twicee0
Outcome
net benefite0
Value
8465 L.E./fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting faba bean at 20 cm between hills and weed control by hand hoeing twice gave the net benefit valued 10435 and 8465 L.E./fed in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2625–2802 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 20 cm spacing with twice hoeing or bentazon plus clethodium for weed suppression and seed yield.

Taxon
faba bean cv. Giza 843Vicia fabae0
Outcome
planting distance 20 cm between hills with using hand hoeing twice or chemical control by bentazon + clethodiume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting faba bean cv. Giza 843 at planting distance 20 cm between hills with using hand hoeing twice or chemical control by bentazon + clethodium depression weed biomass and maximized seed yield/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2860–3059 · show in text ↑

bentazone · weed · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.