Paper · 2020 · Bioscience Journal

Yield and biometry of fertilized sugar cane with organomineral fertilizer of sewage sludge and biostimulant

Emmerson Rodrigues De Moraes; Reginaldo De Camargo; Regina Maria Quintão Lana; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The dependence of mineral fertilizers, increasingly, has brought concern facing the increased demand and because it is a non-renewable mineral resource. The organic fertilization, exclusively, it is impractical in large scale, however, the combination of organic and mineral sources have already proved to be feasible, both from the point of view of nutrition of plants as well as in the aspect of recycling of urban and industrial waste by agriculture. This research had as objective to determine the efficiency of aorganomineral fertilizer formulated on the basis of sewage sludge in substitution of mineral fertilizer in the cultivation of sugar cane in environments with different levels of soil fertility. An experiment was conducted in greater soil fertility, in the Institute Federal Goiano– Campus, Morrinhos-GO, Brazil. The other, less soil fertility, was implanted in the ethanol industry Tijuco Valley, located in Rio do Peixe, district of Prata-MG, Brazil. The experimental design was randomized blocks in a factorial 5 x 2 +1 being five doses, with and without a biostimulant plus an additional with mineral fertilization, in four replications. The doses were in function of fertilization recommendation of planting and coverage for each environment, consisting of: 100 % of the mineral source and percentage 0; 60; 80; 100 and 120 % of organomineral fertilizer. We evaluated the productivity, tillering, diameter and height of stem in Prata-MG the different percentages of the fertilization of planting favored and increased productivity, height and stem diameter of sugar cane; the use of biostimulants not contributed to increase crop yield. In Morrinhos-GO, the different percentage of planting fertilization did not increase the productivity, tillering, height and diameter of the sugarcane stem; the use of biostimulants increases the productivity yield of sugarcane. Organomineral fertilizer based on biosolids is similar to fertilization with mineral fertilizer in environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting fertilizer percentages increased sugarcane productivity at Prata-MG.

Taxon
sugar canee0
Treatment
different percentages of the fertilization of plantinge0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Prata-MGe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in Prata-MG the different percentages of the fertilization of planting favored and increased productivity, height and stem diameter of sugar cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting fertilizer percentages increased sugarcane height at Prata-MG.

Taxon
sugar canee0
Treatment
different percentages of the fertilization of plantinge0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Prata-MGe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in Prata-MG the different percentages of the fertilization of planting favored and increased productivity, height and stem diameter of sugar cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting fertilizer percentages increased stem diameter at Prata-MG.

Taxon
sugar canee0
Treatment
different percentages of the fertilization of plantinge0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Prata-MGe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in Prata-MG the different percentages of the fertilization of planting favored and increased productivity, height and stem diameter of sugar cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants did not increase crop yield at Prata-MG.

Taxon
sugar canet0
Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
not contributed to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the use of biostimulants not contributed to increase crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1656 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase productivity at Morrinhos-GO.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
different percentage of planting fertilizatione0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
did not increasee0
Setting
Morrinhos-GOe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In Morrinhos-GO, the different percentage of planting fertilization did not increase the productivity, tillering, height and diameter of the sugarcane stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase tillering at Morrinhos-GO.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
different percentage of planting fertilizatione0
Outcome
tilleringe0
Direction
did not increasee0
Setting
Morrinhos-GOe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In Morrinhos-GO, the different percentage of planting fertilization did not increase the productivity, tillering, height and diameter of the sugarcane stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase stem height at Morrinhos-GO.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
different percentage of planting fertilizatione0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
did not increasee0
Setting
Morrinhos-GOe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In Morrinhos-GO, the different percentage of planting fertilization did not increase the productivity, tillering, height and diameter of the sugarcane stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase stem diameter at Morrinhos-GO.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
different percentage of planting fertilizatione0
Outcome
diameter of the sugarcane steme0
Direction
did not increasee0
Setting
Morrinhos-GOe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In Morrinhos-GO, the different percentage of planting fertilization did not increase the productivity, tillering, height and diameter of the sugarcane stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants increased sugarcane productivity at Morrinhos-GO.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
productivity yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the use of biostimulants increases the productivity yield of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1815–1885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biosolid organomineral fertilizer performed similarly to mineral fertilizer across environments.

Taxon
sugar canet0
Treatment
Organomineral fertilizer based on biosolidse0
Outcome
similare0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
mineral fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“Organomineral fertilizer based on biosolids is similar to fertilization with mineral fertilizer in environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1998 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 312 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.