Abstract
Aims: Rice is one of the most applied irrigation waters applied plant among cultivated plants since it is grown in water or in saturated soil conditions in a significant portion of the growing season. This study was aimed to determine the effects of rice grown on water use, development, yield and some yield parameters using of both separately and jointly water retention barriers and subsurface drip irrigation methods in Enez, Edirne, Turkey in 2017.Methods and Results: Four different treatments were applied: ponding ((control(C)), subsurface drip irrigation system (SDI), ponding + water retention barrier (C+WRB) and SDI+WRB in this study. Subsurface drip irrigation laterals were placed 10 cm deep from the soil surface and the WRB was placed at 30 cm deep. Plants were irrigated with a constant water height of 10-15 cm on the soil in C and C+WRB treatments, 20% ± 5% of the available water retention capacity is consumed without exposure to water stress in SDI and SDI+WRB treatments, the field capacity is completed. WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice. The yield and irrigation water amount according to the treatments varied between 321-715 kg da-1 and 751-2444 mm, respectively. Conclusions: In comparison to the control treatment, water saving was achieved by 27%, 50%, 69% in C+WRB, SDI and SDI + WRB treatments, respectively. Despite this, when marketable yield values are analysed according to the control treatment, it has increased by 10.8% in C+WRB, and decreased by 48.8% and 40.7% in SDI and SDI + WRB treatments. The water retention barriers and subsurface drip irrigation practices used in the study have been shown to reduce the use of irrigation water in rice production.Significance and Impact of the Study: It can be said that these methods have the potential to be used especially in arid and semi-arid regions where water is limited or inadequate.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Rice grain yield ranged from 321 to 715 kg da-1 across irrigation treatments.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae2 - Outcome
- yielde1
- Value
- 321-715 kg da-1e1
- Qualifier
- according to the treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The yield and irrigation water amount according to the treatments varied between 321-715 kg da-1 and 751-2444 mm, respectively”
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water amount ranged from 751 to 2444 mm across irrigation treatments in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Outcome
- irrigation water amounte1
- Value
- 751-2444 mme1
- Qualifier
- according to the treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The yield and irrigation water amount according to the treatments varied between 321-715 kg da-1 and 751-2444 mm, respectively”
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Water saving of 27% was achieved in the C+WRB treatment compared with the control treatment in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Treatment
- C+WRBe3
- Outcome
- water savinge3
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede3
- Value
- 27%e3
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In comparison to the control treatment, water saving was achieved by 27%, 50%, 69% in C+WRB, SDI and SDI + WRB treatments”
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Water saving of 50% was achieved in the SDI treatment compared with the control treatment in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Treatment
- SDIe3
- Outcome
- water savinge3
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede3
- Value
- 50%e3
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In comparison to the control treatment, water saving was achieved by 27%, 50%, 69% in C+WRB, SDI and SDI + WRB treatments”
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Water saving of 69% was achieved in the SDI + WRB treatment compared with the control treatment in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Treatment
- SDI + WRBe3
- Outcome
- water savinge3
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede3
- Value
- 69%e3
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In comparison to the control treatment, water saving was achieved by 27%, 50%, 69% in C+WRB, SDI and SDI + WRB treatments”
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Marketable yield increased by 10.8% in the C+WRB treatment relative to the control treatment in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Treatment
- C+WRBe4
- Outcome
- marketable yielde4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 10.8%e4
- Comparator
- control treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“when marketable yield values are analysed according to the control treatment, it has increased by 10.8% in C+WRB, and decreased by 48.8% and 40.7% in SDI and SDI + WRB treatments”
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Marketable yield decreased by 48.8% in the SDI treatment relative to the control treatment in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Treatment
- SDIe4
- Outcome
- marketable yielde4
- Direction
- decreasede4
- Value
- 48.8%e4
- Comparator
- control treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“when marketable yield values are analysed according to the control treatment, it has increased by 10.8% in C+WRB, and decreased by 48.8% and 40.7% in SDI and SDI + WRB treatments”
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Marketable yield decreased by 40.7% in the SDI + WRB treatment relative to the control treatment in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Treatment
- SDI + WRBe4
- Outcome
- marketable yielde4
- Direction
- decreasede4
- Value
- 40.7%e4
- Comparator
- control treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“when marketable yield values are analysed according to the control treatment, it has increased by 10.8% in C+WRB, and decreased by 48.8% and 40.7% in SDI and SDI + WRB treatments”
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
WRB and SDI applications significantly affected irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Treatment
- WRB and SDI applicationse2
- Outcome
- irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield componentse2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The water retention barrier and subsurface drip irrigation methods have potential for use in arid and semi-arid regions where water is limited.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Outcome
- potential to be used especially in arid and semi-arid regionse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“It can be said that these methods have the potential to be used especially in arid and semi-arid regions where water is limited or inadequate”
e2“WRB and SDI applications significantly affected the irrigation water amount, grain yield and yield components of rice”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: postharvest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.