Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of foliar application of chemicals on flowering of fruit crops

Disha Dadhaniya; BA Adodariya; Pooja Mishra; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Among the fruit crops of tropical and subtropical region the irregular or erratic flowering, low fruit set as well as fruit retention leading to low yield and fruits of poor quality and short availability period are also the main problems in mango production. Certain chemical sprays found very effective for the reduction of intensity and losses due to these limitations. Foliar application of KNO3, Ethrel and urea significantly increase the flowering percentage. Applications of KNO3 induce early flowering and reduced alternate bearing. Ethrel release ethylene gas and turn triggering the mechanism of flowering. In addition, urea spray was reported to be helpful for better retention of flowering in certain crops. It is also observed that delayed flowering in mango fail to fetch attractive price from the market. Delayed flowering also have risk due to early rainfall, which may bring fruit drop and deterioration in quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)basis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 spray significantly increased flowering percentage.

Treatment
Foliar application of KNO3e0
Outcome
flowering percentagee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of KNO3, Ethrel and urea significantly increase the flowering percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–464 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)basis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel spray significantly increased flowering percentage.

Treatment
Ethrele0
Outcome
flowering percentagee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of KNO3, Ethrel and urea significantly increase the flowering percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–464 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)basis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Urea spray significantly increased flowering percentage.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
flowering percentagee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of KNO3, Ethrel and urea significantly increase the flowering percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–464 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 induced early flowering.

Treatment
KNO3e0
Outcome
early floweringe0
Direction
earlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of KNO3 induce early flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–509 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 reduced alternate bearing.

Treatment
KNO3e0
Outcome
alternate bearinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of KNO3 induce early flowering and reduced alternate bearing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–258 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel releases ethylene gas that triggers flowering.

Treatment
Ethrele0
Compound
ethylene gase0
Outcome
floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethrel release ethylene gas and turn triggering the mechanism of flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–615 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Urea spray improved flower retention in certain crops.

Taxon
certain cropse0
Treatment
urea spraye0
Outcome
retention of floweringe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“urea spray was reported to be helpful for better retention of flowering in certain crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–718 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed mango flowering reduced market price.

Organ / stage
delayed floweringe0
Outcome
attractive price from the markete0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delayed flowering in mango fail to fetch attractive price from the market”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–818 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed flowering carried risk of rainfall associated fruit drop and quality deterioration.

Organ / stage
Delayed floweringe0
Outcome
fruit drop and deterioration in qualitye0
Qualifier
early rainfalle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed flowering also have risk due to early rainfall, which may bring fruit drop and deterioration in quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–258 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · phenology · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

potassium nitrate · phenology · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · phenology · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · phenology · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.