Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Weed management in transplanted rice through flucetosulfuron 10 % WG and its residual effect on succeeding green gram

Shakunthala Sridhara; Pradeep Gopakkali; Basavaraj Naik T; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The Field experiment entitled on Weed management in transplanted rice through Flucetosulfuron 10 % WG and its residual effect on succeeding green gram was conducted at College of Agriculture, Navile, Shivamogga, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, during kharif 2013 and 2014 and rabi 2014-2015. Weed control treatments consisted of Flucetosulfuron 10 % WG at different doses (15 to 30 g a.i. ha-1) and other herbicides Bispyribac Sodium 10 % SC 20 g a.i. ha-1, Azimsulfuron 50 % DF 35 g a.i. ha-1 and hand weeding. Dominant weed flora observed in the experimental plots among grasses were Echinochloa sp. (colonum & crusgalli) and Leptochloa chinensis among sedges Cyperus difformis and Cyperus iria whereas in case of broadleaf weeds (BLW) Ludwigia parviflora, Eclipta prostrata, Alternanthera sessilis, Fimbristylis miliacea and Marselia quadrifolia. Application of Flucetosulfuron 10% WG @ 25g a.i. ha-1 gave consistently good control of all category of weeds, i.e., grasses, sedges and broadleaf weeds and was on par with 10 % WG @ 30 g a.i. ha-1 dose and these herbicides did not cause any phytotoxicity in preceding rice crop as well as succeeding crop green gram and recorded significantly higher grain yield in transplanted rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experimental rice plots contained listed grass, sedge and broadleaf weed taxa.

Outcome
Dominant weed florae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dominant weed flora observed in the experimental plots among grasses were Echinochloa sp. (colonum & crusgalli) and Leptochloa chinensis among sedges Cyperus difformis and Cyperus iria whereas in case of broadleaf weeds (BLW) Ludwigia parviflora, Eclipta prostrata, Alternanthera sessilis, Fimbristylis miliacea and Marselia quadrifolia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flucetosulfuron at 25g a.i. ha-1 controlled grass, sedge and broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
Flucetosulfuron 10% WG @ 25g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
control of all category of weedse0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Flucetosulfuron 10% WG @ 25g a.i. ha-1 gave consistently good control of all category of weeds, i.e., grasses, sedges and broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25g flucetosulfuron dose performed on par with the 30 g dose for weed control.

Outcome
on pare0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
10 % WG @ 30 g a.i. ha-1 dosee0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was on par with 10 % WG @ 30 g a.i. ha-1 dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These herbicides caused no phytotoxicity in preceding rice.

Treatment
these herbicidese0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
did not causee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these herbicides did not cause any phytotoxicity in preceding rice crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These herbicides caused no phytotoxicity in succeeding green gram.

Treatment
these herbicidese0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
did not causee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these herbicides did not cause any phytotoxicity in preceding rice crop as well as succeeding crop green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide treatments gave significantly higher transplanted rice grain yield.

Treatment
these herbicidese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these herbicides did not cause any phytotoxicity in preceding rice crop as well as succeeding crop green gram and recorded significantly higher grain yield in transplanted rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1269 · show in text ↑

Flucetosulfuron · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 10 positive, 43 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.