Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Alternate wetting and drying reduces aquifer withdrawal in Mississippi rice production systems

R. Lee Atwill; L. Jason Krutz; Jason A. Bond; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Water level declines in the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer (MRVAA) are attributed largely to withdrawals for rice ( Oryza sativa L.) irrigation. This study was performed to determine if alternative irrigation strategies for rice could reduce withdrawal from the MRVAA without having an adverse effect on yield and profitability. Research was conducted at 19 on‐farm locations across the Delta region of Mississippi from 2014 through 2016 to determine the effects of irrigation water management practice, i.e., conventional flood via cascade (CONV), multiple side inlet (MSI), and MSI coupled with alternate wetting and drying (AWD), on aquifer withdrawal, rough rice grain yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), and net returns above irrigation costs. Compared to CONV and MSI, up to 39% less water was applied to AWD (P ˂ .0001). Rice grain yield for AWD was not different from either CONV or MSI (P = .1343), despite substantial reductions in water use. Relative to standard irrigation strategies, AWD maintained or increased net returns up to $238 ha −1 for pumping depths from 5.5 m to 122 m and diesel prices from $0.42 L −1 to $0.98 L −1 (P ≤ .0003). Irrigation water use efficiency was up to 59% greater for AWD relative to conventional systems due to the positive effects of the former on water use while maintaining yield (P = .0034). These data demonstrate that AWD can reduce withdrawal from the MRVAA while maintaining or improving yield and net returns relative to irrigation strategies currently employed across the midsouthern USA rice belt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD used up to 39% less water than CONV and MSI.

Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
water was appliede0
Direction
lesse0
Value
39%e0
Comparator
CONV and MSIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to CONV and MSI, up to 39% less water was applied to AWD (P ˂ .0001).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD rice grain yield did not differ from CONV or MSI.

Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
Rice grain yielde0
Direction
not differente0
Comparator
CONV or MSIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice grain yield for AWD was not different from either CONV or MSI (P = .1343)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–937 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD maintained or increased net returns by up to $238 ha −1 across the stated pumping depths and diesel prices.

Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maintained or increasede0
Value
$238 ha −1e0
Qualifier
pumping depths from 5.5 m to 122 m and diesel prices from $0.42 L −1 to $0.98 L −1e0
Comparator
standard irrigation strategiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to standard irrigation strategies, AWD maintained or increased net returns up to $238 ha −1 for pumping depths from 5.5 m to 122 m and diesel prices from $0.42 L −1 to $0.98 L −1 (P ≤ .0003).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1184 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD increased irrigation water use efficiency by up to 59% relative to conventional systems.

Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
Irrigation water use efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
59%e0
Comparator
conventional systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation water use efficiency was up to 59% greater for AWD relative to conventional systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1279 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–152 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.