Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Evaluation of the efficacy of some management tactics against tomato fruitworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in Nangarhar, Afghanistan

Noor Agha Nawakht; Hussain Arman; Sayed Bahauddin Latoon

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato is an economically important vegetable grown worldwide for fresh fruits and processing. This vegetable is attacked by a variety of serious insect pests that greatly reduce the yield. Tomato fruitworm is a destructive pest of this crop which causes great losses in tomato yield. The application of conventional insecticides is one of the most commonly measures practiced by farmers to control this pest. However, insecticide application causes a number of serious problems in human health, environment, and economy. A possible solution to the problems is the adoption of the integrated pest management (IPM) tactic. In the present study, a number of environmentally safer pest management options and safer insecticides were tested against tomato fruitworm in open field tomato. In total, 6 treatments including control were evaluated using Randomized Complete Block (RCB) design with each treatment replicated three times. The results showed a varying degree of fruit damage caused by tomato fruitworm in different treatments on different dates. Although all the tested materials reduced fruit damage to some extent, the damage observed in the treatments with emamectin benzoate and spinosad was lower than in the control plot, suggesting the effectiveness of these insecticides for the control of tomato fruitworm. Potential of considering these insecticides under IPM program is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruitworm damage varied across treatments and dates.

Interactor
tomato fruitwormHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
fruit damage caused by tomato fruitworme0
Direction
varying degreee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed a varying degree of fruit damage caused by tomato fruitworm in different treatments on different dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested materials reduced tomato fruitworm fruit damage to some extent.

Treatment
tested materialse0
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the tested materials reduced fruit damage to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

emamectin benzoate lowered fruit damage compared with the control plot.

Treatment
emamectin benzoatee0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the damage observed in the treatments with emamectin benzoate and spinosad was lower than in the control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad lowered fruit damage compared with the control plot.

Treatment
spinosade0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the damage observed in the treatments with emamectin benzoate and spinosad was lower than in the control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑

spinosad · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

emamectin benzoate · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.