Paper · 2019 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Evaluation of Trap Cropping for the Control of Diamondback Moth

Skylar Sherbrooke

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chapter 1: This quantitative meta-analysis investigates the relationship between oviposition preference, larval mortality on trap crops, and trap crop success by examining two systems that have a large amount of data available for use in meta-analysis. We investigate trap cropping systems used for control of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) and those used in the push-pull system in Kenya for control of stemborers (Chilo partellus), a key pest of maize. Our results suggest that survival on a trap crop relative to the cash crop is a more important indicator than oviposition preference for the trap crop relative to the cash crop for success of trap cropping systems. In the push-pull system, relative survival on the trap crop grass Brachiaria was lower than survival on Napier grass, oviposition preference for Napier grass was greater than for Brachiaria, and trap cropping systems with Brachiaria had lower damage to maize than Napier systems. For diamondback moth, relative to cabbage, yellow rocket (Barbarea vulgaris) was a less suitable host than Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and collards (Brassica oleracea), and caused the greatest reduction of diamondback moth larval infestation on cabbage, although it did not attract the greatest oviposition by female moths. Previous research has primarily focused on oviposition preference to predict trap crop success. Our findings that survival on the trap crop is also a key component of success of trap cropping systems could help guide future trap cropping research. Chapter 2: In Chapter 1, we demonstrate that oviposition preference for, and larval mortality on trap crops are important factors for the success of trap cropping systems. Here, we evaluated Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and yellow rocket (Barbarea vulgaris) as trap crops for protecting broccoli (Brassica oleracea) against diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) in a typical commercial setting in Yuma, Arizona over two cropping periods. During the fall of 2018 and spring of 2019, we used a randomized block design experiment to compare broccoli infestations in plots transplanted with 100% broccoli, 10% or 20% yellow rocket, and 10% Indian mustard. In field choice tests, both yellow rocket and Indian mustard were highly preferred for oviposition over broccoli. Furthermore, the number of larvae was significantly lower on yellow rocket and Indian mustard relative to broccoli, suggesting higher larval mortality on the trap crops relative to broccoli. Nevertheless, during the fall and spring growing season, no significant reduction in the number of larvae on broccoli plants or proportion of broccoli crowns infested at harvest occurred in plots with trap crops relative to plots with 100% broccoli. Our results show that using these trap crops in the density and planting pattern we tested is ineffective for controlling diamondback moth in commercially grown broccoli in Yuma.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival on a trap crop relative to the cash crop is a more important indicator of trap cropping success than oviposition preference.

Taxon
trap crope1
Outcome
success of trap cropping systemse1
Direction
more important indicatore1
Comparator
oviposition preferencee1

Verbatim

e1

“Our results suggest that survival on a trap crop relative to the cash crop is a more important indicator than oviposition preference for the trap crop relative to the cash crop for success of trap cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative survival on the Brachiaria trap crop was lower than on Napier grass in the push-pull system.

Taxon
BrachiariaBrachiariae1
Outcome
relative survival on the trap crope1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
Napier grasse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brachiaria
Brachiaria · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hector Antonio Perez · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the push-pull system, relative survival on the trap crop grass Brachiaria was lower than survival on Napier grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–798 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oviposition preference was greater for Napier grass than for Brachiaria.

Taxon
Napier grassCenchrus purpureuse1
Outcome
oviposition preferencee1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
Brachiariae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“oviposition preference for Napier grass was greater than for Brachiaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap cropping systems with Brachiaria had lower damage to maize than Napier systems.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
trap cropping systems with Brachiariae1
Outcome
damage to maizee1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
Napier systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“trap cropping systems with Brachiaria had lower damage to maize than Napier systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–960 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow rocket was a less suitable host for diamondback moth than Indian mustard and collards, relative to cabbage.

Taxon
Barbarea vulgarisBarbarea vulgarise1
Interactor
diamondback mothPlutella xylostellae1pest
Outcome
suitable hoste1
Direction
less suitablee1
Comparator
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and collards (Brassica oleracea)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Barbarea vulgaris
Barbarea vulgaris · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostella · InteractorPlease report references to olei@despammed.com . · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For diamondback moth, relative to cabbage, yellow rocket (Barbarea vulgaris) was a less suitable host than Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and collards (Brassica oleracea), and caused the greatest reduction of diamondback moth larval infestation on cabbage, although it did not attract the greatest oviposition by female moths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow rocket caused the greatest reduction of diamondback moth larval infestation on cabbage.

Treatment
yellow rocket (Barbarea vulgaris)e1
Interactor
diamondback mothPlutella xylostellae1pest
Outcome
diamondback moth larval infestatione1
Direction
greatest reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostella · InteractorPlease report references to olei@despammed.com . · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For diamondback moth, relative to cabbage, yellow rocket (Barbarea vulgaris) was a less suitable host than Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and collards (Brassica oleracea), and caused the greatest reduction of diamondback moth larval infestation on cabbage, although it did not attract the greatest oviposition by female moths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow rocket did not attract the greatest oviposition by female diamondback moths.

Taxon
Barbarea vulgarisBarbarea vulgarise1
Interactor
diamondback mothPlutella xylostellae1pest
Outcome
oviposition by female mothse1
Direction
did not attract the greateste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Barbarea vulgaris
Barbarea vulgaris · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostella · InteractorPlease report references to olei@despammed.com . · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For diamondback moth, relative to cabbage, yellow rocket (Barbarea vulgaris) was a less suitable host than Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and collards (Brassica oleracea), and caused the greatest reduction of diamondback moth larval infestation on cabbage, although it did not attract the greatest oviposition by female moths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow rocket and Indian mustard were highly preferred for oviposition over broccoli in field choice tests.

Taxon
yellow rocketBarbarea vulgarise1
Outcome
ovipositione1
Direction
highly preferrede1
Comparator
broccolie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Barbarea vulgaris
Barbarea vulgaris · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In field choice tests, both yellow rocket and Indian mustard were highly preferred for oviposition over broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of larvae was significantly lower on yellow rocket and Indian mustard than on broccoli.

Treatment
yellow rocket and Indian mustarde1
Outcome
the number of larvaee1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
broccolie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the number of larvae was significantly lower on yellow rocket and Indian mustard relative to broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2323–2424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap crops gave no significant reduction in larvae on broccoli plants or in broccoli crowns infested at harvest, relative to 100% broccoli.

Treatment
trap cropse1
Outcome
number of larvae on broccoli plants or proportion of broccoli crowns infested at harveste1
Direction
no significant reductione1
Comparator
100% broccolie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“no significant reduction in the number of larvae on broccoli plants or proportion of broccoli crowns infested at harvest occurred in plots with trap crops relative to plots with 100% broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2558–2749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trap crop density and planting pattern tested were ineffective for controlling diamondback moth in commercial broccoli in Yuma.

Treatment
using these trap crops in the density and planting pattern we testede1
Interactor
diamondback mothPlutella xylostellae1pest
Outcome
controlling diamondback mothe1
Direction
ineffectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostella · InteractorPlease report references to olei@despammed.com . · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Our results show that using these trap crops in the density and planting pattern we tested is ineffective for controlling diamondback moth in commercially grown broccoli in Yuma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2751–2928 · show in text ↑

Barbarea vulgaris · Plutella xylostella · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Barbarea vulgaris · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Brassica juncea · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cultivation system · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

trap barrier · Plutella xylostella · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

trap barrier · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.