Paper · 2020 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Front line demonstration for the management of brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) in Kanyakumari district

S. Irulandi; T Anitha; S Shanmugapakkiam; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Among the vegetable crops grown in India, brinjal occupies largest area and plays a vital role in total vegetable production. Brinjal is more vulnerable to the damage caused by shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee which acts as a major pest and cause heavy economic loss to the farmers. To avoid ill effects of insecticides, bio-intensive integrated pest management strategies have been promoted through front line demonstrations in 10 farmers field at Thirupathisaram, Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu, India. The results of ten demonstrations conducted during the year 2015-16 and 2016-17 revealed that shoot and fruit borer damage at vegetative phase was 2.98 per cent in recommended practice and 19.35 in farmers practice. Fruit damage was found to be low in recommended practice (7.71 per cent) while in farmers practice, it was 36.53 per cent. Fruit yield was found to be high (30.45/ha) in IPM field when compared to farmers practice (23.24 t/ha). Benefit Cost Ratio also was found to be high (3.74) in IPM field where as the ratio is low (2.10) in farmers practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended practice had lower vegetative shoot and fruit borer damage than farmer practice, 2.98 versus 19.35 per cent.

Treatment
recommended practicee0
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalis GueneeLeucinodes orbonalist0pest
Outcome
shoot and fruit borer damage at vegetative phasee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
2.98 per cente0
Qualifier
19.35e0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot and fruit borer damage at vegetative phase was 2.98 per cent in recommended practice and 19.35 in farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended practice had lower fruit damage than farmer practice, 7.71 versus 36.53 per cent.

Treatment
recommended practicee0
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalis GueneeLeucinodes orbonalist0pest
Outcome
Fruit damagee0
Direction
lowe0
Value
7.71 per cente0
Qualifier
36.53 per cente0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit damage was found to be low in recommended practice (7.71 per cent) while in farmers practice, it was 36.53 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM fields had higher fruit yield than farmer practice, 30.45/ha versus 23.24 t/ha.

Treatment
IPM fielde0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
highe0
Value
30.45/hae0
Qualifier
23.24 t/hae0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield was found to be high (30.45/ha) in IPM field when compared to farmers practice (23.24 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM fields had higher benefit-cost ratio than farmer practice, 3.74 versus 2.10.

Treatment
IPM fielde0
Outcome
Benefit Cost Ratioe0
Direction
highe0
Value
3.74e0
Qualifier
2.10e0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benefit Cost Ratio also was found to be high (3.74) in IPM field where as the ratio is low (2.10) in farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑

ipm · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results differ

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.