Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of different levels of n p k and rhizobium on soil physico-chemical properties and yield attribute of green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2

Nitin Kumar Singh; Tarence Thomas; P Smriti Rao

17
claims
51
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was carried out at soil science research farm of Sam Higgin bottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Praygraj during summer season 2017-18.The design applied was 3x3 factorial randomized block design having three factors with three levels of NPK @ 0, 50, and 100 % ha-1, three levels of Rhizobium @ 0, 50 and 100% ha-1 respectively. The result obtained with treatment T8-[NPK@ 50% + Rhizobium @ 100%] that showed the highest yield regarding, gave the best results with respect to plant height 60.16 cm, number of leaves plant-1 33, No. of pod plant-1 38.77, it gave highest yield 12.10 q ha-1. The maximum cost benefit ratio was recorded 1: 2.29 and net profit. rs. 20843.2ha-1 in treatment combinationT8-L2M2 [@ 100% NPK ha-1+ 100% Molybdenum ha-1] combined use of NPK resulted in significant increase on enrichment of soil fertility status. Rhizobium in combination resulted in a slight increase in pH 7.24, EC 0.26 dSm-1. In post soil of NPK fertilizers observations were resulted in significant increase in OC 0.77 %, Particle density 2.60 g/cm3, Bulk density 1.24 g/cm3,Porespace 56.22% and available N 337.32 kgha-1, P 35.62 kg ha-1, K 205.54 kg ha-1, significant increase in case of Nitrogen (kg ha-1), Phosphorus (kg ha-1), Potassium (kg ha-1) was found to be significant among other treatments in Green gram cultivation and soil quality improvement. It was also revealed that the application of NPK with Rhizobium were excellent source for fertilization than fertilizers. The treatment (T8) also showed greater benefit cost ratio followed by other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NPK 50% plus Rhizobium 100% treatment (T8) gave the highest green gram yield, 12.10 q ha-1

Treatment
NPK@ 50% + Rhizobium @ 100%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.10 q ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment T8-[NPK@ 50% + Rhizobium @ 100%] that showed the highest yield regarding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“it gave highest yield 12.10 q ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NPK 50% plus Rhizobium 100% treatment (T8) gave the best plant height, 60.16 cm

Treatment
NPK@ 50% + Rhizobium @ 100%e0
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
best resultse2
Value
60.16 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment T8-[NPK@ 50% + Rhizobium @ 100%] that showed the highest yield regarding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“gave the best results with respect to plant height 60.16 cm, number of leaves plant-1 33”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NPK 50% plus Rhizobium 100% treatment (T8) gave the best number of leaves per plant, 33

Treatment
NPK@ 50% + Rhizobium @ 100%e0
Outcome
number of leaves plant-1e2
Direction
best resultse2
Value
33e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment T8-[NPK@ 50% + Rhizobium @ 100%] that showed the highest yield regarding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“gave the best results with respect to plant height 60.16 cm, number of leaves plant-1 33”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NPK 50% plus Rhizobium 100% treatment (T8) gave the best number of pods per plant, 38.77

Treatment
NPK@ 50% + Rhizobium @ 100%e0
Outcome
No. of pod plant-1e3
Direction
best resultse2
Value
38.77e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment T8-[NPK@ 50% + Rhizobium @ 100%] that showed the highest yield regarding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“gave the best results with respect to plant height 60.16 cm, number of leaves plant-1 33”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–569 · show in text ↑
e3

“No. of pod plant-1 38.77”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK plus 100% Molybdenum combination (T8-L2M2) gave the maximum cost benefit ratio, 1: 2.29

Treatment
100% NPK ha-1+ 100% Molybdenum ha-1e5
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe4
Direction
maximume4
Value
1: 2.29e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum cost benefit ratio was recorded 1: 2.29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–684 · show in text ↑
e5

“net profit. rs. 20843.2ha-1 in treatment combinationT8-L2M2 [@ 100% NPK ha-1+ 100% Molybdenum ha-1]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK plus 100% Molybdenum combination (T8-L2M2) gave the maximum net profit, rs. 20843.2 per ha

Treatment
100% NPK ha-1+ 100% Molybdenum ha-1e5
Outcome
net profite5
Direction
maximume4
Value
rs. 20843.2ha-1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum cost benefit ratio was recorded 1: 2.29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–684 · show in text ↑
e5

“net profit. rs. 20843.2ha-1 in treatment combinationT8-L2M2 [@ 100% NPK ha-1+ 100% Molybdenum ha-1]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T8 treatment gave a greater benefit cost ratio than the other treatments

Treatment
T8e6
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe6
Direction
greatere6
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e6

“The treatment (T8) also showed greater benefit cost ratio followed by other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizers significantly increased soil organic carbon (OC), 0.77 %

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
OCe1
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.77 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“In post soil of NPK fertilizers observations were resulted in significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“OC 0.77 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizers significantly increased soil particle density, 2.60 g/cm3

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
Particle densitye2
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.60 g/cm3e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“In post soil of NPK fertilizers observations were resulted in significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1046 · show in text ↑
e2

“Particle density 2.60 g/cm3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizers significantly increased soil bulk density, 1.24 g/cm3

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
Bulk densitye3
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.24 g/cm3e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“In post soil of NPK fertilizers observations were resulted in significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1046 · show in text ↑
e3

“Bulk density 1.24 g/cm3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizers significantly increased soil porespace, 56.22%

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
Porespacee4
Direction
increasee0
Value
56.22%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“In post soil of NPK fertilizers observations were resulted in significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1046 · show in text ↑
e4

“Porespace 56.22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizers significantly increased available nitrogen, 337.32 kg ha-1, among other treatments

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
available Ne5
Direction
increasee0
Value
337.32 kgha-1e5
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“In post soil of NPK fertilizers observations were resulted in significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1046 · show in text ↑
e5

“available N 337.32 kgha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1160 · show in text ↑
e6

“was found to be significant among other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizers significantly increased available phosphorus, 35.62 kg ha-1, among other treatments

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
Pe5
Direction
increasee0
Value
35.62 kg ha-1e5
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“In post soil of NPK fertilizers observations were resulted in significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1046 · show in text ↑
e5

“P 35.62 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1177 · show in text ↑
e6

“was found to be significant among other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizers significantly increased available potassium, 205.54 kg ha-1, among other treatments

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
Ke5
Direction
increasee0
Value
205.54 kg ha-1e5
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“In post soil of NPK fertilizers observations were resulted in significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1046 · show in text ↑
e5

“K 205.54 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1195 · show in text ↑
e6

“was found to be significant among other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium in combination slightly increased soil pH to 7.24

Treatment
Rhizobiume0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.24e0
Qualifier
slighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobium in combination resulted in a slight increase in pH 7.24, EC 0.26 dSm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium in combination slightly increased soil EC to 0.26 dSm-1

Treatment
Rhizobiume0
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.26 dSm-1e0
Qualifier
slighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobium in combination resulted in a slight increase in pH 7.24, EC 0.26 dSm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–962 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NPK combined with Rhizobium is an excellent fertilization source, better than fertilizers alone

Treatment
application of NPK with Rhizobiume7
Outcome
excellent source for fertilizatione7
Comparator
fertilizerse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata l.) var. hum-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–149 · show in text ↑
e7

“It was also revealed that the application of NPK with Rhizobium were excellent source for fertilization than fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1518 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.