Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Safe and cost effective management of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using green insecticide baits

Dileep Kumar NT; Murali Mohan K; Prabhu C Ganiger; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a new invasive species in India. This pest is occurring in serious proportions, causing significant damage to the maize crop in several states across the country. Insecticides are applied several times for managing the fall armyworm on maize, which significantly increases the cost of plant protection. In this study green chemistry molecules were directly applied to the leaf whorls in the form of poison baits, in the place of foliar sprays. Main objective of this study was to reduce the cost of plant protection by changing the method of chemical delivery and to make the produce safe for consumption by using green chemistry (slightly toxic) insecticides. Poison baits prepared using spinetoram 5 ml/kg, 2.5 ml/kg and novaluron 5 ml/kg recorded maximum larval mortality and minimized the leaf damage by fall armyworm. These insecticides contributed for 97.20, 93.15 and 92.46 per cent reduction in larval population over untreated control, respectively at 14 days after second application. Comparative efficacy of insecticide when applied as baits vis-a-vis foliar sprays suggested that the difference was non-significant in spinetoram, novaluron and chlorantraniliprole. There was substantial reduction in the cost of plant protection ranging from 22 to 44 per cent in bait application over foliar spray involving same insecticide. Overall, this study opens up new opportunity for reducing the cost of plant protection while managing fall armyworm on maze.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinetoram 5 ml/kg reduced fall armyworm larvae by 97.20 versus untreated control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
spinetoram 5 ml/kge0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
larval populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
97.20e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinetoram 5 ml/kg, 2.5 ml/kg and novaluron 5 ml/kg recorded maximum larval mortality and minimized the leaf damage by fall armyworm. These insecticides contributed for 97.20, 93.15 and 92.46 per cent reduction in larval population over untreated control, respectively at 14 days after second application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall armyworm on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2.5 ml/kg reduced fall armyworm larvae by 93.15 versus untreated control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
2.5 ml/kge0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
larval populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
93.15e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinetoram 5 ml/kg, 2.5 ml/kg and novaluron 5 ml/kg recorded maximum larval mortality and minimized the leaf damage by fall armyworm. These insecticides contributed for 97.20, 93.15 and 92.46 per cent reduction in larval population over untreated control, respectively at 14 days after second application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall armyworm on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

novaluron 5 ml/kg reduced fall armyworm larvae by 92.46 per cent versus untreated control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
novaluron 5 ml/kge0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
larval populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
92.46 per cente0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinetoram 5 ml/kg, 2.5 ml/kg and novaluron 5 ml/kg recorded maximum larval mortality and minimized the leaf damage by fall armyworm. These insecticides contributed for 97.20, 93.15 and 92.46 per cent reduction in larval population over untreated control, respectively at 14 days after second application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall armyworm on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bait and foliar spinetoram efficacy did not differ significantly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
spinetorame0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
Outcome
differencee0
Comparator
foliar sprayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of insecticide when applied as baits vis-a-vis foliar sprays suggested that the difference was non-significant in spinetoram, novaluron and chlorantraniliprole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1253 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall armyworm on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bait and foliar novaluron efficacy did not differ significantly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
novalurone0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
Outcome
differencee0
Comparator
foliar sprayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of insecticide when applied as baits vis-a-vis foliar sprays suggested that the difference was non-significant in spinetoram, novaluron and chlorantraniliprole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1253 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall armyworm on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bait and foliar chlorantraniliprole efficacy did not differ significantly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
chlorantraniliprolee0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
Outcome
differencee0
Comparator
foliar sprayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of insecticide when applied as baits vis-a-vis foliar sprays suggested that the difference was non-significant in spinetoram, novaluron and chlorantraniliprole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1253 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall armyworm on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bait application lowered plant protection costs by 22 to 44 per cent versus foliar sprays.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
bait applicatione0
Outcome
cost of plant protectione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
22 to 44 per cente0
Comparator
foliar spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantial reduction in the cost of plant protection ranging from 22 to 44 per cent in bait application over foliar spray involving same insecticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1414 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall armyworm on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–319 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect

47 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

novaluron · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Spinetoram · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.