Paper · 2020 · Food Additives & Contaminants Part A

Development and validation of TOF/Q-TOF MS/MS, HPLC method and in vitro bio-strategy for aflatoxin mitigation

Alfred Mitema; Naser Aliye Feto; Mohamed Suhail Rafudeen

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Some secondary metabolites produced by fungi are carcinogenic, hepatotoxic, and/or cause birth defects in humans and animals. We developed and optimised bio-analytical tools for detection of metabolites, aflatoxins and evaluated the effectiveness of the methods in co-infected maize tissues. Isolate KSM012 (atoxigenic) demonstrated no peaks and no blue fluorescence on HPLC and TLC plates respectively confirming non-toxicity. AFB1 and AFB2 were produced by Isolate KSM015 in addition to AFG1 and AFG2, which is an indication of possible SBG morphotype. The limits of quantification and detection ranged from 0.02 to 35.81 µg/mL and 0.01–6.8 µg/mL, respectively. The best mass spectrum with lowest noise was obtained at 100% ACN and sterile water spiked with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The positive ion mode with electrospray ionisation application exhibited better fragmentation for mycotoxins. In total 17 metabolites were detected by targeted and formula mass. KDVI maize line exhibited high fungal colonisation in comparison to GAF4 at equal co-infection ratio 50:50. AFB1 and AFG2 were remarkably higher in GAF4 in comparison to sensitive KDV1 (p ˂ 0.05). The detection limits, linearity and sensitivity showed the method developed was suitable for the determination of mycotoxin in comparisons to the guidelines of European Commission 657/EC 2002.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize line KDVI showed higher fungal colonisation than GAF4 at an equal co-infection ratio of 50:50.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
KDVIe0
Outcome
fungal colonisatione0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
equal co-infection ratio 50:50e0
Comparator
GAF4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KDVI maize line exhibited high fungal colonisation in comparison to GAF4 at equal co-infection ratio 50:50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1091 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AFB1 and AFG2 levels were remarkably higher in the maize line GAF4 than in the sensitive line KDV1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
GAF4e0
Outcome
AFB1 and AFG2e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sensitive KDV1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AFB1 and AFG2 were remarkably higher in GAF4 in comparison to sensitive KDV1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“co-infected maize tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–290 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The limits of quantification of the developed method ranged from 0.02 to 35.81 µg/mL.

Outcome
limits of quantificatione0
Value
0.02 to 35.81 µg/mLe0

Verbatim

e0

“The limits of quantification and detection ranged from 0.02 to 35.81 µg/mL and 0.01–6.8 µg/mL, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–662 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The limits of detection of the developed method ranged from 0.01 to 6.8 µg/mL.

Outcome
limits of quantification and detectione0
Value
0.01–6.8 µg/mLe0

Verbatim

e0

“The limits of quantification and detection ranged from 0.02 to 35.81 µg/mL and 0.01–6.8 µg/mL, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–662 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best mass spectrum with the lowest noise was obtained with 100% ACN and sterile water spiked with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min.

Outcome
best mass spectrum with lowest noisee0
Value
100% ACN and sterile water spiked with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/mine0

Verbatim

e0

“The best mass spectrum with lowest noise was obtained at 100% ACN and sterile water spiked with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–805 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In total 17 metabolites were detected by targeted and formula mass.

Outcome
metabolites were detectede0
Value
17e0

Verbatim

e0

“In total 17 metabolites were detected by targeted and formula mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–983 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The detection limits, linearity and sensitivity showed the developed method was suitable for determining mycotoxin, in comparison with European Commission 657/EC 2002 guidelines.

Outcome
suitable for the determination of mycotoxine0
Comparator
guidelines of European Commission 657/EC 2002e0

Verbatim

e0

“The detection limits, linearity and sensitivity showed the method developed was suitable for the determination of mycotoxin in comparisons to the guidelines of European Commission 657/EC 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1373 · show in text ↑