Paper · 2020

Effect of fertigation on growth and fruit yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown under naturally ventilated polyhouse condition

Kumar, Pramod; Ansari, Abdul Majid; Swapnil; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during two consecutive years, rabi- 2019-20 and rabi-2020-2021 in polyhouse condition at Zonal Research Station, Chianki, Palamau, Jharkhand, sub-zone – V to study the effect of different levels of fertigation on growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). The experiment was laid out in randomized block design in four replications with six fertigation treatments viz. T1 - 120% RDF, T2 - 110% RDF, T3 - 100% RDF, T4 - 90% RDF, T5 - 80% RDF and T6 - Control. The treatments were replicated four times. Among all the treatments, minimum days to first flowering, minimum days to first picking, maximum number of primary branches and harvest duration were recorded with application of T3- 100% RDF for both the years. The yield attributes viz. maximum average fruit weight, number of fruits per plant, fruit diameter, fruit length, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per hectare were recorded highest with the application of 100% RDF. Therefore, drip irrigation lead to improvement in cucumber plant growth and yield, especially with the application of 100% RDF compared to others.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF minimized days to flowering and first picking.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T3- 100% RDFe0
Outcome
days to first flowering, minimum days to first pickinge0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
Among all the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days to first flowering, minimum days to first picking, maximum number of primary branches and harvest duration were recorded with application of T3- 100% RDF for both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF maximized primary branches and harvest duration.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T3- 100% RDFe0
Outcome
number of primary branches and harvest duratione0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days to first flowering, minimum days to first picking, maximum number of primary branches and harvest duration were recorded with application of T3- 100% RDF for both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF gave the highest fruit weight, fruit count and diameter.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
average fruit weight, number of fruits per plant, fruit diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum average fruit weight, number of fruits per plant, fruit diameter, fruit length, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per hectare were recorded highest with the application of 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF gave the highest fruit length and yields per plant and hectare.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
fruit length, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per hectaree0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum average fruit weight, number of fruits per plant, fruit diameter, fruit length, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per hectare were recorded highest with the application of 100% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.