Paper · 2020 · Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences F Toxicology & Pest Control

Influence of Some Weed Control Treatments on The Yield and Quality of Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.)

Massoud, A.; A. Sharshar; M. Abd-El-Salam; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during two successive summer seasons of 2018 and 2019 cotton crop (Gossypium barbadense L.) Giza 94 was planted. Eigh treatments + control were evaluated to demonstrate the effect of herbicides on the density of weeds and the morphological characteristics of weeds and cotton. Moreover, all weed control significantly decreased weeds parameters and increased yield components in both seasons. Also, gave ahighly significant increase in seed cotton yield (Kantar/Fadden). The highest values were obtained with stomp ®+ hand howing (45 DAP) and hand hoeing twice ( 30, 45 DAP) during two seasons (12.32a, 11.62a) and (11.9 a, 10.9 ab ). From obtainingresults the highest effect on fresh and dry weight weeds decreased with the stomp ®+ hand howing (45 DAP) and hand howingtwice (30, 45 DAP). These practices gave the highest reduction in weeds density and increased cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control treatments significantly decreased weed parameters in cotton compared with control.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
weed controle1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weeds parameterse1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Eigh treatments + control were evaluated to demonstrate the effect of herbicides on the density of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–254 · show in text ↑
e1

“all weed control significantly decreased weeds parameters and increased yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control treatments significantly increased yield components of cotton compared with control.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
weed controle1
Outcome
yield componentse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Eigh treatments + control were evaluated to demonstrate the effect of herbicides on the density of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–254 · show in text ↑
e1

“all weed control significantly decreased weeds parameters and increased yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control treatments gave a highly significant increase in seed cotton yield compared with control.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
all weed controle1
Outcome
seed cotton yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Eigh treatments + control were evaluated to demonstrate the effect of herbicides on the density of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–254 · show in text ↑
e1

“all weed control significantly decreased weeds parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–381 · show in text ↑
e2

“gave ahighly significant increase in seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomp plus hand hoeing at 45 DAP and hand hoeing twice gave the highest values in both seasons.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
stomp ®+ hand howing (45 DAP) and hand hoeing twice ( 30, 45 DAP)e3
Outcome
valuese3
Direction
higheste3
Value
12.32a, 11.62ae3
Qualifier
11.9 a, 10.9 abe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest values were obtained with stomp ®+ hand howing (45 DAP) and hand hoeing twice ( 30, 45 DAP) during two seasons (12.32a, 11.62a) and (11.9 a, 10.9 ab )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomp plus hand hoeing at 45 DAP gave the highest decrease in fresh and dry weight of weeds.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
stomp ®+ hand howing (45 DAP)e4
Interactor
weedse4weed
Outcome
fresh and dry weight weedse4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest effect on fresh and dry weight weeds decreased with the stomp ®+ hand howing (45 DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest reduction in weed density in cotton came from the stomp plus hand hoeing and hand hoeing practices.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
These practicese5
Interactor
weedse5weed
Outcome
weeds densitye5
Direction
reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–102 · show in text ↑
e5

“These practices gave the highest reduction in weeds density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–886 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.