Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Plant Density and Genotype Evaluation for High Density Planting System of Cotton under Rainfed Condition

A. D. Pandagale; K. S. Baig; S. S. Rathod; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate optimum plant density and suitable G. hirsutum cotton genotype for high density planting system under rainfed condition. Plant growth parameters, seed cotton yield and economics of cotton genotypes under various high planting densities were studied during kharif, 2013-14 to 2015-16 on medium soil. Increase in plant density has reduced monopodial branches plant-1 whereas, number of bolls plant were increased with increase in density. The plant density of 1.66 lakh plants ha-1 (spacing 60 x 10 cm) resulted in higher seed cotton yield (1705 kg ha-1) and net monetary returns (Rs. 40,496/- ha-1). The hirsutum cotton genotypes NH 615, NH 635 and Suraj were found suitable for high density planting system as exhibited greater number of bolls plant-1, yield plant-1, seed cotton yield ha-1 (1742 kg ha-1 and 1683 kg ha-1, respectively) and monetary returns. The genotype Suraj was found to be high ginner (37.40 per cent) followed by NH 615 (37.35 per cent).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density reduced monopodial branches per plant.

Treatment
Increase in plant densitye0
Outcome
monopodial branches plant-1e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in plant density has reduced monopodial branches plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. hirsutum cotton genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density increased bolls per plant.

Treatment
increase in densitye0
Outcome
number of bolls plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of bolls plant were increased with increase in density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–480 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. hirsutum cotton genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A density of 1.66 lakh plants per hectare gave higher seed cotton yield of 1705 kg per hectare.

Treatment
1.66 lakh plants ha-1 (spacing 60 x 10 cm)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1705 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant density of 1.66 lakh plants ha-1 (spacing 60 x 10 cm) resulted in higher seed cotton yield (1705 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–597 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. hirsutum cotton genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A density of 1.66 lakh plants per hectare gave higher net returns of Rs. 40,496 per hectare.

Treatment
1.66 lakh plants ha-1 (spacing 60 x 10 cm)e0
Outcome
net monetary returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 40,496/- ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant density of 1.66 lakh plants ha-1 (spacing 60 x 10 cm) resulted in higher seed cotton yield (1705 kg ha-1) and net monetary returns (Rs. 40,496/- ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–642 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. hirsutum cotton genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NH 615, NH 635 and Suraj were judged suitable for dense planting based on boll number, per-plant yield, seed cotton yield and returns.

Material
NH 615, NH 635 and Suraje0
Outcome
suitable for high density planting systeme0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hirsutum cotton genotypes NH 615, NH 635 and Suraj were found suitable for high density planting system as exhibited greater number of bolls plant-1, yield plant-1, seed cotton yield ha-1 (1742 kg ha-1 and 1683 kg ha-1, respectively) and monetary returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–902 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suraj had the highest ginning percentage, 37.40 percent.

Material
Suraje0
Outcome
high ginnere0
Direction
highe0
Value
37.40 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype Suraj was found to be high ginner (37.40 per cent) followed by NH 615 (37.35 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“hirsutum cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NH 615 followed Suraj in ginning percentage at 37.35 percent.

Material
NH 615e0
Outcome
ginnere0
Direction
followede0
Value
37.35 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype Suraj was found to be high ginner (37.40 per cent) followed by NH 615 (37.35 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“hirsutum cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–673 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 130 positive, 41 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.