Paper · 2020 · Agricultural Research Journal

Evaluation of potency of some insecticidal treatment schedule against Myzus persicae incidence on Potato

B Kahar

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Potency of some insecticidal treatment schedules, viz T1 (spiromesifen + spiromesifen), T2 (thiamethoxam + thiamethoxam), T3 (thiacloprid + thiacloprid), T4 (imidacloprid+ imidacloprid), T5 (cartap hydrochloride + cartap hydrochloride), T6 (chlorpyriphos + chlorpyriphos) and T7 (untreated control) were evaluated against Myzus persicae (Sulzer) on potato variety, Kufri Jyoti for two potatogrowing years in 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. Among the seven different treatments, two foliar sprays of thiamethoxam 25 WG @125 g a.i/ha after emergence followed by second spray after 15 days of first spray and two foliar sprays of spiromesifen 240 S.C. @ 96 g a.i./ha after emergence followed by second spray after 30 days of first spray were found most effective in reducing the population of aphids. Cost benefit analysis revealed that T2 was most effective and at par with T1. The effect of thiamethoxam on natural enemies showed least detrimental effect followed by spiromesifen and imidacloprid. After tuberization, highest harvested yield of tuber and highest benefit cost ratio was found in treatment with thiamethoxam (T2) and spiromesifen (T1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two thiamethoxam sprays were among the most effective schedules for reducing aphid population.

Treatment
two foliar sprays of thiamethoxam 25 WG @125 g a.i/hae0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
population of aphidse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two foliar sprays of thiamethoxam 25 WG @125 g a.i/ha after emergence followed by second spray after 15 days of first spray and two foliar sprays of spiromesifen 240 S.C. @ 96 g a.i./ha after emergence followed by second spray after 30 days of first spray were found most effective in reducing the population of aphids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two spiromesifen sprays were among the most effective schedules for reducing aphid population.

Treatment
two foliar sprays of spiromesifen 240 S.C. @ 96 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
population of aphidse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two foliar sprays of thiamethoxam 25 WG @125 g a.i/ha after emergence followed by second spray after 15 days of first spray and two foliar sprays of spiromesifen 240 S.C. @ 96 g a.i./ha after emergence followed by second spray after 30 days of first spray were found most effective in reducing the population of aphids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The thiamethoxam schedule had the best cost benefit performance, comparable with spiromesifen.

Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
T1e0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cost benefit analysis revealed that T2 was most effective and at par with T1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam was least detrimental to natural enemies, followed by spiromesifen and imidacloprid.

Treatment
thiamethoxame0
Interactor
natural enemiese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
natural enemiese0
Direction
least detrimentale0
Comparator
spiromesifen and imidaclopride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of thiamethoxam on natural enemies showed least detrimental effect followed by spiromesifen and imidacloprid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam treatment gave the highest harvested tuber yield and benefit cost ratio after tuberization.

Organ / stage
tuberizatione0
Treatment
thiamethoxam (T2)e0
Outcome
harvested yield of tuber and highest benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After tuberization, highest harvested yield of tuber and highest benefit cost ratio was found in treatment with thiamethoxam (T2) and spiromesifen (T1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiromesifen treatment gave the highest harvested tuber yield and benefit cost ratio after tuberization.

Organ / stage
tuberizatione0
Treatment
spiromesifen (T1)e0
Outcome
harvested yield of tuber and highest benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After tuberization, highest harvested yield of tuber and highest benefit cost ratio was found in treatment with thiamethoxam (T2) and spiromesifen (T1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–104 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · Aphidomorpha · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · Aphidomorpha · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.