Abstract
Background: Agriculture and its allied sectors is an important sector in employment, income and food security. The increasing demands for food grains and cash crops, the area under fodder crops has been static since last 3-4 decades (8.4 mha) resulted into a net deficit in dry and green fodder is around 10 and 35%, respectively making livestock rearing more challenging. Conventional agriculture has largelybeen characterized by conventional tillage which caused soil degradation and negative impacts on soil physical and biological activity. To mitigate these negative effects, resource conservation technologies (RCTs) was tested and adopted to save substantial quantity of irrigation water, reducing the cost of cultivation, timely sowing, improve input use efficiency and left indirect effect on mitigating the adverse effect of climate changes. Biological N2 fixation (BNF) can make plants self-sustaining for N nutrition and avoiding the need for mineral N fertilization. The current study aimed enhancing fodder production by adoption of modern tillage practices and efficient N management. Methods: In this field-laboratory investigation during 2017-18, experiment was laid out in the split plot design consisting of three tillage practices zero tillage (ZT), conventional tillage (CT) and raised bed (RB) and six N management viz., N0, N75, N75+Rhizo, N100, N100+Rhizo and N125%. The soil of the experimental field was clay loam in texture having pH 7.30, EC; 0.35 dS/m, medium in organic carbon (0.63%), low in nitrogen (188.48 kg/ha), medium in phosphorus (23.56 kg/ha) and potassium (271.12 kg/ha). The recommended dose of fertilizer and other cultural practices was applied as per treatments with standard process. The crop was harvested at 60 days after sowing and weighed for green fodder yield. The observations growth, yields and quality parameters was recorded as per the standard method. Statistical analysis was done using analysis of variance in split plot design. Result: ZT practices significantly improved growth attributes, fodder yield and available nitrogen. Higher fodder yield of cowpea was recorded with ZT as compared to CT and it was statistically similar in RB. The nitrogen management practices had significant effect on root length and root nodules, plant growth attributes, fodder yield and available N, P and K. The significant fodder yield was increase with successive increase of N application up to 75% N + rhizobium, over 0 and 75% N alone. The present work shows that adoption of ZT and inoculation of rhizobia had significantly improved soil health and stabilized fodder yield of cowpea besides decrease fertilizer nitrogen requirement in the irrigated agro-ecosystem of T-IGP.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage significantly improved cowpea growth attributes, fodder yield and available nitrogen.
- Taxon
- Cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- ZT practicese0
- Outcome
- growth attributes, fodder yield and available nitrogene0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“ZT practices significantly improved growth attributes, fodder yield and available nitrogen”
t0“fodder Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage gave higher cowpea fodder yield than conventional tillage and a statistically similar yield to raised beds.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Higher fodder yield of cowpea was recorded with ZT as compared to CT and it was statistically similar in RB”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen management significantly affected cowpea root length, nodules, growth, yield and soil available N, P and K.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Treatment
- nitrogen management practicese0
- Outcome
- root length and root nodules, plant growth attributes, fodder yield and available N, P and Ke0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The nitrogen management practices had significant effect on root length and root nodules, plant growth attributes, fodder yield and available N, P and K”
e1“Higher fodder yield of cowpea was recorded”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen through 75% N plus rhizobium significantly raised fodder yield over zero and 75% N alone.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Treatment
- 75% N + rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- fodder yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 0 and 75% N alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The significant fodder yield was increase with successive increase of N application up to 75% N + rhizobium, over 0 and 75% N alone”
e1“fodder yield of cowpea besides decrease”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage and rhizobial inoculation improved soil health and stabilized cowpea fodder yield while lowering fertilizer nitrogen requirement.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Outcome
- fodder yielde0
- Setting
- T-IGPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“adoption of ZT and inoculation of rhizobia had significantly improved soil health and stabilized fodder yield of cowpea besides decrease fertilizer nitrogen requirement in the irrigated agro-ecosystem of T-IGP”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.