Paper · 2020 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Optimization of maize (Zea mays L) cultivation in post tin mining land

T Lestari; R Apriyadi; Hartina

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Post tin mining land can be used as agriculture land with ameliorant application and plant spacing modification. This research aimed to study the ameliorant type and plant spacing that affects the growth and yield of maize in post tin mining land. This research was conducted in Post-Tin mining land, Bangka, from February to May 2020. This research used Factorial Randomized Block Design with two factors and three replications. The first factor was ameliorant application consisted of Topsoil (K1), N, P, K + Topsoil (K2), Block compost of cassava peel waste + Topsoil (K3). The second factor was plant spacing (30cm x80 cm (J1); 50 cmx60 cm (J2); 70 cmx40 cm(J3)). The result showed that ameliorant application gave a significant effect on the growth and yield of maize parameters in post tin mining land. Plant spacing gave the best effect on cop production/ha, dry seed weight, and dry seed production/ha. NPK + Topsoil ameliorant with 30 cm x 80 cm plant spacing gave the best interaction on leaves number, cop diameter, and dry seed weight of maize in post tin mining land.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ameliorant application significantly affected maize growth and yield parameters.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ameliorant applicatione0
Outcome
growth and yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ameliorant application gave a significant effect on the growth and yield of maize parameters in post tin mining land.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant spacing gave the best effect on cob production per hectare, dry seed weight, and dry seed production per hectare.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Plant spacinge0
Outcome
cop production/ha, dry seed weight, and dry seed production/hae0
Direction
best effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant spacing gave the best effect on cop production/ha, dry seed weight, and dry seed production/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus topsoil with 30 cm by 80 cm spacing gave the best interaction for leaf number, cob diameter, and dry seed weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
NPK + Topsoil ameliorant with 30 cm x 80 cm plant spacinge0
Outcome
leaves number, cop diameter, and dry seed weighte0
Direction
best interactione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK + Topsoil ameliorant with 30 cm x 80 cm plant spacing gave the best interaction on leaves number, cop diameter, and dry seed weight of maize in post tin mining land.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–34 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.