Paper · 2020 · Scientific Reports

Breeding progress for pathogen resistance is a second major driver for yield increase in German winter wheat at contrasting N levels

Holger Zetzsche; Wolfgang Friedt; Frank Ordon

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Breeding has substantially increased the genetic yield potential, but fungal pathogens are still major constraints for wheat production. Therefore, breeding success for resistance and its impact on yield were analyzed on a large panel of winter wheat cultivars, representing breeding progress in Germany during the last decades, in large scale field trials under different fungicide and nitrogen treatments. Results revealed a highly significant effect of genotype (G) and year (Y) on resistances and G × Y interactions were significant for all pathogens tested, i.e. leaf rust, strip rust, powdery mildew and Fusarium head blight. N-fertilization significantly increased the susceptibility to biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens. Resistance was significantly improved over time but at different rates for the pathogens. Although the average progress of resistance against each pathogen was higher at the elevated N level in absolute terms, it was very similar at both N levels on a relative basis. Grain yield was increased significantly over time under all treatments but was considerably higher without fungicides particularly at high N-input. Our results strongly indicate that wheat breeding resulted in a substantial increase of grain yield along with a constant improvement of resistance to fungal pathogens, thereby contributing to an environment-friendly and sustainable wheat production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype and year had highly significant effects on winter wheat resistances.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
winter wheat cultivarse1
Outcome
resistancese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a highly significant effect of genotype (G) and year (Y) on resistances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–496 · show in text ↑
e1

“were analyzed on a large panel of winter wheat cultivars, representing breeding progress in Germany during the last decades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–327 · show in text ↑
t0

“German winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G × Y interactions were significant for resistance to all four tested pathogens in winter wheat cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
winter wheat cultivarse1
Outcome
G × Y interactionse0
Qualifier
for all pathogens testede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G × Y interactions were significant for all pathogens tested, i.e. leaf rust, strip rust, powdery mildew and Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–630 · show in text ↑
e1

“were analyzed on a large panel of winter wheat cultivars, representing breeding progress in Germany during the last decades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–327 · show in text ↑
t0

“German winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N-fertilization significantly increased the susceptibility of winter wheat to biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N-fertilizatione0
Interactor
biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility to biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogense0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-fertilization significantly increased the susceptibility to biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“German winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance in winter wheat improved significantly over time, at different rates for the pathogens.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
winter wheat cultivarse1
Outcome
Resistancee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
at different rates for the pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance was significantly improved over time but at different rates for the pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–823 · show in text ↑
e1

“were analyzed on a large panel of winter wheat cultivars, representing breeding progress in Germany during the last decades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–327 · show in text ↑
t0

“German winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absolute progress of resistance against each pathogen was higher at the elevated N level in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated N levele0
Outcome
average progress of resistance against each pathogene0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in absolute termse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the average progress of resistance against each pathogen was higher at the elevated N level in absolute terms, it was very similar at both N levels on a relative basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“German winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative progress of resistance against each pathogen was very similar at both N levels in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
average progress of resistance against each pathogene0
Direction
very similare0
Qualifier
on a relative basise0
Comparator
both N levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the average progress of resistance against each pathogen was higher at the elevated N level in absolute terms, it was very similar at both N levels on a relative basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“German winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of winter wheat increased significantly over time under the fungicide and nitrogen treatments.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicide and nitrogen treatmentse1
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
over timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was increased significantly over time under all treatments but was considerably higher without fungicides particularly at high N-input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“in large scale field trials under different fungicide and nitrogen treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“German winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of winter wheat was considerably higher without fungicides, particularly at high N-input.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
without fungicidese0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
considerably highere0
Qualifier
particularly at high N-inpute0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was increased significantly over time under all treatments but was considerably higher without fungicides particularly at high N-input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“German winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–108 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

52 papers: 23 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Wheat without added nitrogen had more FHB than wheat with adequate nitrogen.

    Planting Date and Nitrogen Effects on Fusarium Head Blight and Leaf Spotting Diseases in Spring Wheat · 2007 · compared with adequate N

    Opposite directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.