Paper · 2020 · Samara Journal of Science

The study of the genus Hydrangea L. representatives reproduction by cuttings in various environmental conditions in the Republic of Bashkortostan

Fanuza Kavievna Murzabulatova; Natalia Viktorovna Polyakova

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The paper deals with the study results of the Hydrangea species reproduction by green and lignified cuttings based on the collection of the South-Ural Botanical Garden-Institute of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The purpose of the work is to study the reproduction by cuttings of species and varieties of the genus Hydrangea and to identify optimal environmental conditions for the most effective result of cuttings. During the experiments green cuttings were rooted in 5 different types of substrates (sand, peat, a mixture of sand and peat, a mixture of sand and perlite, a mixture of peat and perlite). As rooting stimulants Kornevin and Heteroauxin were used. The reproduction of Hydrangea by lignified cuttings was studied after various storage methods during winter. It was found that the maximum rooting percentage is obtained when peat is used as a substrate (rooting reaches 96,7%). The maximum root-forming ability when reproduced by green cuttings using rooting stimulants (Kornevin and Heteroauxin) was observed in H. arborescens (86,6-93,3%) and its varieties (79,8-96,5%). High results were obtained when tree hydrangea was reproduced by both green and lignified cuttings. The root-forming ability of lignified cuttings increases when they are stored during winter under snow.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peat as a substrate gave the maximum rooting percentage of Hydrangea green cuttings, reaching 96.7%.

Taxon
HydrangeaHydrangeat0
Treatment
peat is used as a substratee0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
96,7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hydrangea
Hydrangea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydrangea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“the maximum rooting percentage is obtained when peat is used as a substrate (rooting reaches 96,7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. arborescens green cuttings treated with Kornevin and Heteroauxin showed the maximum root-forming ability, 86.6-93.3%.

Taxon
H. arborescensHydrangea arborescense0
Treatment
rooting stimulants (Kornevin and Heteroauxin)e0
Outcome
root-forming abilitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
86,6-93,3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hydrangea arborescens
Hydrangea arborescens · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum root-forming ability when reproduced by green cuttings using rooting stimulants (Kornevin and Heteroauxin) was observed in H. arborescens (86,6-93,3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties of H. arborescens treated with Kornevin and Heteroauxin showed maximum root-forming ability of 79.8-96.5%.

Taxon
H. arborescensHydrangea arborescense0
Material
its varietiese0
Treatment
rooting stimulants (Kornevin and Heteroauxin)e0
Outcome
root-forming abilitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
79,8-96,5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hydrangea arborescens
Hydrangea arborescens · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum root-forming ability when reproduced by green cuttings using rooting stimulants (Kornevin and Heteroauxin) was observed in H. arborescens (86,6-93,3%) and its varieties (79,8-96,5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree hydrangea gave high rooting results from both green and lignified cuttings.

Taxon
tree hydrangeae0
Outcome
High resultse0

Verbatim

e0

“High results were obtained when tree hydrangea was reproduced by both green and lignified cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-forming ability of lignified Hydrangea cuttings increases when they are stored during winter under snow.

Taxon
HydrangeaHydrangeat0
Treatment
stored during winter under snowe0
Outcome
root-forming ability of lignified cuttingse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hydrangea
Hydrangea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydrangea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“The root-forming ability of lignified cuttings increases when they are stored during winter under snow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1326 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · HydrangeaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.